Dead Men Walking

Old Server Admin Section => SOG War Room => Silver Oak Guardians => Archived Topics => SOG Archive => Topic started by: TeaLeaf on March 06, 2006, 07:33:04 AM

Title: About Attendance
Post by: TeaLeaf on March 06, 2006, 07:33:04 AM
Can I check what we're measuring here?  I thought what we were checking was availability rather than attendance?  Thus not necessarily the people who got into the raid, but those who on any given night were available to raid and wanted to get in?

TL.
Title: About Attendance
Post by: Ragnarh on March 08, 2006, 01:41:15 AM
not sure.....
I am thinking of not fillingthe rec  for guardian.
Was thinking of noting down dates of missed raids /not on during raid .
and editing them out if they were far appart. tho currently posting attended raid dates :/ think We need to agre on a effective method of dooing this.Or we wil be looking at some weird data that noone understand.
Title: About Attendance
Post by: Vargen on March 09, 2006, 04:23:38 PM
Kaiz is not on your list pente.
Title: About Attendance
Post by: TeaLeaf on March 09, 2006, 04:48:22 PM
Why don;t we post the queue list here instead?  That way if we need to review attendance we can fairly quickly add up the raids and the queue slots from this thread.  It also gives us all ready access to the queue list.

Or am I missing something here?  :help2:

TL.
Title: About Attendance
Post by: Pentesilea on March 10, 2006, 04:48:16 AM
QuoteOriginally posted by Vargen@Mar 9 2006, 06:23 PM
Kaiz is not on your list pente.
[post=116136]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

Kaiz is Defender so no need to keep track of him
Title: About Attendance
Post by: Vargen on March 10, 2006, 09:45:58 AM
You should keep track of defenders too. Especially one that wants to be bumped up to Guardian.
Title: About Attendance
Post by: Bastet on March 10, 2006, 11:12:18 AM
Okee TL, what i been doing is keeping track of ppl that join our raids in this way:

Guardian:
Bastet, Attended 3, Queue 0, Missed 0 (100%)
Menedil, Attended 3, Queue 0, Missed 0 (100%)
Dalto, Attended 2, Queue 1, Missed 0 (100%)
Noevra, Attended 3, Queue 0, Missed 0 (100%)
Kain, Attended 1, Queue 2, Missed 0 (100%)
Bricktamland, Attended 1, Queue 1, Missed 1 (66%)

Defender:
Iruga, Attended 0, Queue 0, Missed 0 (0%)

As you can see from above list we currently have an avg showup of arround 5 2/3 rogue per nite, so far in 3 raids 4 rogues where in que for an avg of 1 1/3 per raid. This could sujest the current level of attendance between rogues is so high we dont actualy need 6 guardians. If other people would use this same system it would give us an idea on wich classes barely make the 2/3 requirement and wich classes might be better off with a guardian less.

Now as far as i can see we only keeping this info for 4 of the 8 classes we have atm. But if any1 has a better idea about attendance i am all ears.
Title: About Attendance
Post by: TeaLeaf on March 10, 2006, 11:47:28 AM
Someone already keeps the queue list - post it up.  We already have the attendance on DKP site, so marry the two together as and when we need to review and we have a proper attendance record.

Do we need 8 people doing this each raid all the time rather than the above simpler solution?
Title: About Attendance
Post by: Pentesilea on March 15, 2006, 05:51:22 AM
QuoteOriginally posted by Vargen@Mar 10 2006, 11:45 AM
You should keep track of defenders too. Especially one that wants to be bumped up to Guardian.
[post=116259]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]



Kaiz is out  :blush: