Dead Men Walking

Old Server Admin Section => SOG Archive => SOG War Room => Silver Oak Guardians => Archived Topics => The Clean Up => Topic started by: Tinilgawiel on March 18, 2006, 06:07:33 PM

Title: Forum quality
Post by: Tinilgawiel on March 18, 2006, 06:07:33 PM
Oh well. I won't be posting any more quality content due to the fact that this forum is guided by rules straight from the room rules at theoligy faculty.

You'r loss.

This even makes me so furious that I'm thinking of taking a break from SoG. This is'nt exactly the type of human relations I was introduced too when I joined the guild. We are a closed section and shouldn't need to have the same rules as the rest.

So I'll just  :dummy:  off to Kate and tata for now.

And BlueBalls. If you don't think that Kate is quality content. I challenge you.

btw. Kregoron and Gorion. You have PM with the link  :narnar:
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Gorion on March 18, 2006, 06:16:23 PM
heh.. you dont know what youre missing :D

bdw, keep the links flowing pls :)
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Sinap on March 18, 2006, 06:27:19 PM
PM it me please :D
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Gorion on March 18, 2006, 06:29:42 PM
you have mail :D
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Tinilgawiel on March 18, 2006, 06:50:06 PM
Oh. I forgot. this must serious be a coincident

blueballs is "slang" for a medical condition known in plain english to be overfilled testicles. Now we all now that hurts and the only remedy is to w**k off. So I'm just guessing he wanted Kate all for himself.

Sorry. I couldn't contain this yem  :roflmao:
Title: Forum quality
Post by: TeaLeaf on March 18, 2006, 06:57:03 PM
I am afraid that despite my polite request to you by PM you responded to me with vitriol.  You have now taken to making juvenile comments about a forum admin and mispelling his name.  

Have you stopped to think that maybe, just maybe, YOU might be the one who needs to sit back and take stock of what you did?

Please refrain from taking out your personal frustration on forum moderators or admins.  They are doing a job, they do not get paid and your reaction is childish to say the least.  Freedom of speech is a right earned, not demanded and then wasted.

TL.
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Tinilgawiel on March 18, 2006, 07:15:58 PM
As long as the number offended are miniscule in favor of non offended I don't see the problem.

I have a sick sence of humour sometimes, And I couldn't resist it in this case. Yes it is childish but sometimes you can't keep it in. I said sorry. But as in this forums silence is obviously gold....

Attacking everyone that is critical about the rules in this forums gives me a chill of the past in the form of the USSR.

The only one that I may have offended is BlueBall in this case. and no one else. Pointing out someone elses point of view even in a bit drastic setting of words is not.

Sry BlueBall if you were offended, it wasn't the intention, but hey. I guess you can take a joke about yourself just as well as I can.

I'm sitting down right now. so yes. Think about why YOU are offended.
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Anonymous on March 18, 2006, 07:27:08 PM
I am offended because you posted a link to a porn site on these forums! Additionally, you decided to suggest in the accompanying text that people might like to visit this site to help with masturbating.

If you can't see anything wrong with that fine. But you won't do it here!
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Tinilgawiel on March 18, 2006, 07:32:00 PM
Well. We all have our needs. But I see we have a different meaning and sense of the word porn. The pictures there where not porn in my book. Porn is when you actually is having something shoved somewhere. A picture of a naked girl aint exactly that. It's called nude posing. not porn. And no. Posting porn on these forums havent been in my mind at all. the link why I posted these is because she is a known WoW player and most of the guys in SoG actually like her.

and sry again if I had fun at your expense.

And I would like to point out that I haven't come with any sexual, racist and or political remarks about anybodys preference ie another post here having a poll if somebody in the guild is gay or not. By allowing that and not this. You have sunk very very very low on my personal scale. Thank you for watching.
Title: Forum quality
Post by: KreuZ on March 18, 2006, 07:38:47 PM
The difference imo is that Sinap takes it with a laugh and knows it's only fun and games. That post was only directed at one person and I'm pretty sure that Sinap wasn't offended. Your post could have offended some people and I actually approve of what they did. I didn't join SoG for porn and cursing.  :D
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Tinilgawiel on March 18, 2006, 07:41:10 PM
QuoteOriginally posted by KreuZ@Mar 18 2006, 08:38 PM
The difference imo is that Sinap takes it with a laugh and knows it's only fun and games. That post was only directed at one person and I'm pretty sure that Sinap wasn't offended. Your post could have offended some people and I actually approve of what they did. I didn't join SoG for porn and cursing. :D
[post=117946]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

I did   :lmfao:

But back to the case. You allow mocking somebody about sexual preference, You allow the Three Word Story, But you dont allow a nude photograph of a finer specimen of the race women. Now that is, excuse me. totally bonkers.
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Neff on March 18, 2006, 10:04:23 PM
PM me the link Tini?:D

Well my 2 cents is that somethings are more ..whats the word , a much more sensitive area, "porn" or porn links posted is wrong against the rules, but some guild humour isnt.

Im trying not to take any sides, but just "sleep on it" it may be stupid rules that tango isnt allowed here, but that makes the "WHY THE TANGO AM I " posts kinda stupid, if you flame off and everything comes out like tango its kinda stuipd, so you need to think alot more thant before ;)

I dont mind the rules, nor do i like them, i just live by them ;)
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Sinap on March 18, 2006, 11:41:44 PM
Yeah you guys can laugh all you like about some picture Voretex photoshopped :P Aslong as I can call Kreuz a noob, Neff AFK man and ask Luthor for Fearward every 5 minutes :P
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Sinap on March 18, 2006, 11:43:18 PM
Also, I laugh at everything, I love seeing funny stuff, listening to funny stuff, looking at funny stuff, whatever, and Tini probably has a sense of humor like mine, just dont go abusing admins and deliberatly trying to piss people off, and thats all fine with me.
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Tinilgawiel on March 19, 2006, 02:19:54 AM
I have abused noone. I'm no rapist!
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Gorion on March 19, 2006, 10:25:48 AM
QuoteOriginally posted by Sinap@Mar 19 2006, 12:41 AM
Yeah you guys can laugh all you like about some picture Voretex photoshopped :P Aslong as I can call Kreuz a noob, Neff AFK man and ask Luthor for Fearward every 5 minutes :P
[post=117972]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]


AHA! so i was right about my gut feeling...!
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Luthor on March 20, 2006, 12:30:52 AM
QuoteOriginally posted by Sinap@Mar 19 2006, 12:41 AM
Yeah you guys can laugh all you like about some picture Voretex photoshopped :P Aslong as I can call Kreuz a noob, Neff AFK man and ask Luthor for Fearward every 5 minutes :P
[post=117972]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

So Sinap, i guess i have to figure out some way i can start harrasing you?

Fearward? pfftt... thats for tango Priests  :D
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Sinap on March 20, 2006, 01:23:18 AM
:D what priest are you, melee spec? Pfft.. go to IF "LFG Any Instance, im a melee spec priest, i dont heal or give fearward!!!111" :P
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Tinilgawiel on March 20, 2006, 08:32:47 AM
Now you all are being off topic  :roflmao:
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Sinap on March 20, 2006, 09:07:03 AM
In the off-topic forums :P
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Bob on March 20, 2006, 09:19:39 AM
QuoteOriginally posted by Tinilgawiel@Mar 20 2006, 09:32 AM
Now you all are being off topic :roflmao:
[post=118094]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]
I don't think there ever has been a thread that has stayed completely on topic throughout all the posts on our forums - but where would the fun in that be :lmfao:
Title: Forum quality
Post by: noevra on March 20, 2006, 11:33:24 AM
Well on topic:
my feelings is that the rules are yust B*ll Sh*t. If there are people that get offended in the guild bye name calling, they should putt guildchat off. because the content there is sometimes worse then here. (before the we went to this forum i meen, were we weren't silenst.)

If people outsite our guild take offence of what we put here, we should make our own forum, ore they souldn't be allowed to get to read it. Why the sould in the first place i dont realy see.

Besites that. its al little oftoppic. but not that long ago optical made a sacastic post about priest. I in my mind that it whas funny. but there whas a small discusion going on. and bastet killed that. because of no class winning. i think this is bad. verry bad even. If admins ganne delete ore edit post. Then all members of the forum are curios what happent and you blow up the stuf like it whas realy ment.
and even if it whas realy ment. why not have a discusion about it? if some one can make me play my class better ore have some good sugestions, and making that offius bye posting a whinn post i can give some feedback, ore acsplain it. ore i can yust ignor it. ore learn from it. its all what I want to do with it. and if admins ganne delete this why do we have a forum in the first place? in that cass i could better yust go and stop posting here.

so well geas this is my last post for a ling time here. atleast if im not needed to post here. no more spamming bye my side :-) mebay that is yust a good thing :huh:

Greet noevra
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Bob on March 20, 2006, 01:52:34 PM
On topic: Concerning rules about cursing, linking to porn (or porn related stuff), I am totally fine with that.  I have no problem seing the word tango, when I actually wrote fu**.  People know what it means anyhow, so they get my point.  It's just some simple rules which we hace to follow - no biggie at all!

QuoteOriginally posted by noevra@Mar 20 2006, 12:33 PM
Besites that. its al little oftoppic. but not that long ago optical made a sacastic post about priest. I in my mind that it whas funny. but there whas a small discusion going on. and bastet killed that. because of no class winning. i think this is bad. verry bad even.
[post=118114]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]
This I think is a much bigger concern.  The thread you are reffering to Noevra, is this one (http://forum.deadmen.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=13181).  I posted a few comments there which you can read, and I was also hoping for some "official" reply from the officers (and perhaps some kind of appology or something?), but I haven't seen anything like it.  Perhaps some of the officers would like to comment on the matter?
Title: Forum quality
Post by: TeaLeaf on March 20, 2006, 02:39:19 PM
Several points here so I'll try to cover some in one post.

First off, this is not a big issue.  If you think about it you'll find that typing a correctly worded post actually takes more time than just firing off an expletive.  In my book that's good news because it means that 90% more pople will have thought about their post before hitting the submit button - and that can only improve the quality of the forums.  The 'add quality' bit is in the forum acceptable use policy as has already been pointed out.  If you struggle to express yourself without swearing then maybe you ought not to post and spend the time saved on improving your written language skills?

Secondly, it saddens me that the reaction to the original problem was 'well he shouldn't have been here'.  We have younger members in the Guild, many have children who will creep up behind Dad/Mum and see what is typed on the screen, hear what is said or read what is typed. Yes you could apply filters to this, but they are not perfect and surely the answer is simply to moderate your own profanity?   If you feel the need to exercise your democratic right to swear then go set up a a special 'cuss hole' on IRC and cuss away to your heart's content.  Nobody will be there to read it mind you.  If the whole forums were like the 'supported' posts then it would make for impossible reading and would descend into utter chaos.

Re Bob's point:  It is a common misconception that free speech is free.  It isn't.  You can go debate that point if you want, but it comes with an attached basic assumption that the people exercising that right are sufficiently mature and aware of their responsibilities to others.  Some aren't, hence we have forum rules.  

There are also legal issues to consider.  Law varies from country to country, but the wonder fo the modern internet is that you get sued in the country of complaint, not where the forum is necessarily hosted.  So we have to be careful as the board owners and moderators are potentially in law responsible for the content.  Just remember, if you really annoy someone then it could be a SoG member who is the complainer so having a special section for cussing really wouldn't work as we would have to ban everyone from it!

Somebody has to make a call over post quality and that is why the forums have Moderators - in this case it was a SoG Officer who was the Moderator.      The post in question might have been intended as a joke, but it certainly was not taken that way by a number of people and its content was damaging the Guild morale and contrary to the tolerance the Officers had specifically asked for recently with regard to healers, hence it was removed and a reminder was posted to say why.  I don't think that's hard to understand and it is certainly not something people should get upset about.

Whether the forum costs or not was also raised during this discussion and the comment was made that we should not go for the 'free' solution where it required you to sell your literary soul by having a boundary enforced.  Yes this forum costs SoG less than the one we used to use, but go and pick any SoG Officer and ask them if they have found the day to day running of the Guild, it's raids, it's raid members, the applications, member gripes and the administration of Guild affairs easier.  I do nto believe you will find a single Officer who would not completely support the move irrespective of cost.  Some people who have posted have no idea how much work goes into running a Guild behind the scenes - the Officers put many long hours into making the week run smoothly and this forum is a part of that process.

Looking at what I have written now it seems like a hugely verbose reply, for which I apologise, but the swearing in this Guild is a problem and everyone here needs to face it.  When I first joined SoG it was not like it is today and we all have a shared responsibility to both admit it and to deal with it.  Free speech yes, but it comes with some strings.  If someone doesn;t keep the strings taut then you'll eventually get the string wrapped around your neck and strangle yourself.

TL.
Title: Forum quality
Post by: sitha on March 20, 2006, 03:15:17 PM
There are two seperate issues here. One is the moderation of posts because of excessive use of swearing, porn links etc. Which I'm fine with.

The other is the moderation of a post because some people might be upset by what it is written. Not because the content is illegal, offensive etc. But because the author think you are doing a bad job. Yes I know Optical was joking, but that's not the point. If people aren't satisfied with healers it should be brought up so we can discuss it. Removing the post doesn't only remove the complaint, which everyone know was posted anyways. It also strips the healers of a way to respond to it.

People shouldn't stop complaining about healing because they are told to, but because they have a better understanding of how things work and that healers are actually doing all they can to keep everyone up.

In my opinion the forums is the ideal place to discuss this. People have here an opportunity to get their point through without being interrupted all the time.

We should be able to have a discussion like this like mature people without it affecting the general morale of the guild.
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Bob on March 20, 2006, 03:18:52 PM
I was going to wait until I came back from work to give a long answer to your post TL, but Sitha seemed to give it for me.  So I just sign that, and say that I totally agree with all he just said, both about the moderation due to swearing, and the moderation due to "wrong" oppinions :D
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Neff on March 20, 2006, 03:40:25 PM
Well freedom of speach is one thing, but we need to adapt to the rules of this forum, its easy as that . Some people are offended , but its not that many that actually has problems with not being able to swearing, is it really that big of a deal?
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Sinap on March 20, 2006, 04:07:14 PM
My overall opinion is that if its something like what Optical said, a joke about priest healing, it should be left. Why remove it from a forum? Fair enough, if Optical posted some TANGO animal porn or some crap then remove it, please, but when its someones opinion on a topic, or something not totally disgusting/wrong then leave it.
Title: Forum quality
Post by: TeaLeaf on March 20, 2006, 04:21:26 PM
My comments were not meant to support jokes being removed, but they were to support the decision of an officer acting as a moderator who thought it was not a joke.  Most things (even the banal) are left well alone in these forums and long may that continue, but where other people also do not think it a joke and given then already tense nature of healer criticism recently then it is sometimes acceptable and sensible not to leave a lighted match next to the pool of oil.  I tend to post a comment at the end of a thread and then use the 'close thread' option where I think a thread is getting out of line, other moderators will do the things they believe appropriate.  But everyone is adjusting and learning, so let's give everyone some time to adjust.

TL.
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Bob on March 20, 2006, 05:43:41 PM
QuoteOriginally posted by TeaLeaf+Mar 20 2006, 05:21 PM-->
QUOTE(TeaLeaf @ Mar 20 2006, 05:21 PM)
My comments were not meant to support jokes being removed
[post=118172]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]
This I understand very well, and I did not take it that way either :)

QuoteOriginally posted by TeaLeaf@Mar 20 2006, 05:21 PM
but they were to support the decision of an officer acting as a moderator who thought it was not a joke
This part I don't "understand" quite as well (I understand perfectly what you literary say, but I very much disagree with it).
It seems now that in the situation that has risen, instead of trying to clean up things and perhaps admit that a small mistake (what I personally think was a mistake) has been made, you seem to try the best you can to twist and tweak what has been said many times before about not offending people and create a negative tension.

QuoteOriginally posted by TeaLeaf@Mar 20 2006, 05:21 PM
Most things (even the banal) are left well alone in these forums and long may that continue
This is very much appreciated, and for that you should have credit :clap:

QuoteOriginally posted by TeaLeaf@Mar 20 2006, 05:21 PM
but where other people also do not think it a joke and given then already tense nature of healer criticism recently then it is sometimes acceptable and sensible not to leave a lighted match next to the pool of oil
First of all, wether it was a joke or not, is of no importance to this subject.
Secondly, I try really hard (I really do, believe me on that) to understand why what was said is such a bad thing(and I read it before it got deleted), but I just can't.  Now I only raid 2 of 3 nights due to RL stuff, so I might have missed out on something, but I can't say that I have noticed anything to this so called "tense nature of healer crisicism" (and just to remind you, I am a healer myself).  I'm not shure what more to say to try and make you see this from my point of view, so I'll just quote what Sitha so elegant said earlier, which I think sums it up pretty well:
QuoteOriginally posted by Sitha@Mar 20 2006, 04:15 PM
Removing the post doesn't only remove the complaint, which everyone know was posted anyways. It also strips the healers of a way to respond to it.

People shouldn't stop complaining about healing because they are told to, but because they have a better understanding of how things work and that healers are actually doing all they can to keep everyone up.
And just to have said it: if people feel like throwing shit at my healing capabilities, I can take it.  First of all, because I know I'm doing as good a job as I possibly can (which I think in total is pretty good), and secondly, because sometimes I might actually learn a new trick that can help me improve myself too, cause sometime people can make positive criticism as well :)


QuoteOriginally posted by TeaLeaf@Mar 20 2006, 05:21 PM
I tend to post a comment at the end of a thread and then use the 'close thread' option where I think a thread is getting out of line, other moderators will do the things they believe appropriate.
What you do here TL, is a very good thing, and I actually think all the moderators should have this as a rule whenever they edit or remove some content.  Not necessarily close the thread, but at least submit a (good) explanation of why the moderation was performed.
First of all because you should always be able to "defend" your decision to do such a thing when it is done, and secondly, doing this might actually prevent people from getting pissed because of it.

Title: Forum quality
Post by: Tinilgawiel on March 21, 2006, 09:55:53 AM
QuoteOriginally posted by TeaLeaf@Mar 20 2006, 03:39 PM

There are also legal issues to consider. Law varies from country to country, but the wonder fo the modern internet is that you get sued in the country of complaint, not where the forum is necessarily hosted. So we have to be careful as the board owners and moderators are potentially in law responsible for the content. Just remember, if you really annoy someone then it could be a SoG member who is the complainer so having a special section for cussing really wouldn't work as we would have to ban everyone from it!

TL.
[post=118136]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

now dear TL. Why haven't they nuked a well known swedish torrent site if you say the law works that way? Oh, because it's where the site is hosted that the law applies now isn't it? You can sue me all you want from britain as long as the country I am living in allows it. (be in mind civilized nations and not unga bunga dictator states)
Title: Forum quality
Post by: TeaLeaf on March 21, 2006, 10:30:14 AM
Tini, you clearly did not understand the section you quoted from.  Maybe it's a language problem?  I invite you to re-read that section of the post and will be happy to discuss it with you further if you need help in understanding that bit of my post.  May I suggest that in order not to bore the pants off people we do this via a PM or on TS where I will be happy to dedicate some quality time to you to discuss this issue?


TL.
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Tinilgawiel on March 21, 2006, 11:12:40 AM
I think we shouldn't debate laws :) Because they can be really difficult to understand. But the material on a site hosted isn't illegal in the country of origin, watching it in a country that is illegal (aka downloading to the cache) is illegal :)

As for the rest of the post. i only quoted that perticular part.
Title: Forum quality
Post by: noevra on March 21, 2006, 11:17:40 AM
<_< im calling this. im not a moderator, but we have 3 toppics up. issnt that a bit to mutch? and were now going from 1 disscusion to a ather, all attack tl. well not attacking, but quoteing and saying no no no. well yust do like i do, whats porn and have a good time watching it and thinking haha bastet and tl dont ever ganne watch this hihi haha hihi im leet they are not. and about the violent talk. well yust hide it and mebey the kids of your kids arent allowed anny more to say whiskey tango foxtrot ? oscar mike golf !!! and we make history and we need to thank tl for that and the moderators of this forum. so well its a good thing okey

btw your all TANGO'S  :devil:
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Padding on March 21, 2006, 11:36:44 AM
I would have to say that swearing etc is generally unnecessary. You dont need to swear to emphasize your point, so i think the rules of the forums are just fine

As long as we use decency and common sense, most language are fine, but i really cant see that swearing is a need on the forums

To make it a discussion about laws in a country is taking it way to far. Then you need to go into politics
Title: Forum quality
Post by: noevra on March 21, 2006, 11:46:37 AM
QuoteOriginally posted by Padding@Mar 21 2006, 11:36 AM
Then you need to go into politics
[post=118316]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

and if we do that i will do gquit :blink:
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Neff on March 21, 2006, 02:06:48 PM
Quoteall attack tl

Well i cant really see me attacking him, or disagreeing :P dont put every horse in the same stable Noe;)
Title: Forum quality
Post by: noevra on March 21, 2006, 02:10:47 PM
QuoteOriginally posted by Neff@Mar 21 2006, 02:06 PM
dont put every horse in the same stable Noe;)
[post=118357]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]


why not? isn't that what TanGo gnom's like :roflmao:
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Tinilgawiel on March 21, 2006, 02:51:19 PM
Damn you Noevra. I was trying to keep a certain grade of professionalism in this thread. but hey. I put it in the wrong section. And next time write dutch so I can understand j00. And I'm not attacking anyone :)
Title: Forum quality
Post by: noevra on March 21, 2006, 02:56:08 PM
QuoteOriginally posted by Tinilgawiel@Mar 21 2006, 02:51 PM
Damn you Noevra. I was trying to keep a certain grade of professionalism in this thread. but hey. I put it in the wrong section. And next time write dutch so I can understand j00. And I'm not attacking anyone :)
[post=118365]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

vechten?
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Tinilgawiel on March 21, 2006, 04:24:54 PM
graag! haha. Now we are beeing off-topic. Enough with the nonsense, in with some seriousness :D
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Neff on March 21, 2006, 05:28:09 PM
"being offtopic" well everything sog does is offtopic;) so ooo

*edit** why the hell am i posting here? I should have been on the store by now! :ranting: **
Title: Forum quality
Post by: Bob on March 21, 2006, 05:59:17 PM
QuoteOriginally posted by Neff+Mar 21 2006, 06:28 PM-->
QUOTE(Neff @ Mar 21 2006, 06:28 PM)
"being offtopic" well everything sog does is offtopic;) so ooo
[post=118414]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]
And you're the best of us all to do exactly that Neff :P