Dead Men Walking

Old Server Admin Section => dMw Matches and Training (Private) => Archived Feb 09 => Announcements & General Discussion - Training & Matches => Topic started by: Hippy on June 14, 2006, 09:12:11 PM

Title: dMw vs gL. on de_dust2_cz
Post by: Hippy on June 14, 2006, 09:12:11 PM
Result: 7 - 23


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Kills Deaths
Terrorist Forces 5 10

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
-=[dMw]=-KKND 0 0
-=[dMw]=-JB 0 0
-=[dMw]=-Blood_Thirsty 0 0
-=[dMw]=-Hippy 0 0
-=[dMw]=-Doris 0 0
 
CT Forces 2 13

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
-=[dMw]=-Blood_Thirsty 10 15
-=[dMw]=-JB 7 13
-=[dMw]=-Doris 7 15
-=[dMw]=-Hippy 4 15
-=[dMw]=-KKND 0 0
 
 
Match Notes:
 
We lost the knife round and they chose CT. We did a split rush long and short, it didnt work. we lost about 7 rounds before pulling back to make it 5-10. we started the second half promisingly but nothing worked :( Their AWPer had reactions like..well...nothing compares. They were a litlle spongey too.
Title: dMw vs gL. on de_dust2_cz
Post by: Hippy on June 14, 2006, 09:13:50 PM
If anyone has the 1st half screeny please send it to me, and KK left before i could get him on the second one, if ya remeber/got screeny of his score plz say.

Im waitin till JB gives the all clear before i accept
Title: dMw vs gL. on de_dust2_cz
Post by: JB on June 14, 2006, 10:38:01 PM
HLTV Demo (http://www.number72.eclipse.co.uk/demos/dmw-gL.zip)


Well I dunno what to say, the guy with the awp wasn't clearly wallhacking, but, he just couldnt have reactions that quick.   :blink:

Watch it yourself, personally I'd ask the ED admins to look at the demo and get their opinion.  Not as a 'we think they cheat', but morely as a 'what do you think'.

They also used 2 awps as T's, I counted 3 times before demo crashed near end.
Title: dMw vs gL. on de_dust2_cz
Post by: Hippy on June 15, 2006, 03:56:13 PM
There's definately something dodgy about that, he shoots before he can even see them.  :eyebrow:

If anyone wants to see what we're talking about its raneST*R you need to watch.
Title: dMw vs gL. on de_dust2_cz
Post by: MAD_ness on June 15, 2006, 04:10:58 PM
Unlucky folks ....dont think we have managed any result against these guys yet ..

 :(
Title: dMw vs gL. on de_dust2_cz
Post by: DuVeL on June 15, 2006, 04:38:52 PM
I'll check it out aswell.
UL guys.

I get corrupt Error message, any idea?>
Title: dMw vs gL. on de_dust2_cz
Post by: Hippy on June 15, 2006, 07:11:32 PM
I got multiple bogus entries or something.  :blink:  

Still played for me though.
Title: dMw vs gL. on de_dust2_cz
Post by: Whitey on June 16, 2006, 04:24:54 PM
Daywalker contacted me on MSN asking if someone could accept the result.
Title: dMw vs gL. on de_dust2_cz
Post by: Hippy on June 16, 2006, 05:24:46 PM
I was leaving that to one of the head admins, i'm not sure what to do in regards to the 3rounds we are owed and the cheat thing  :dummy:
Title: dMw vs gL. on de_dust2_cz
Post by: MAD_ness on June 16, 2006, 05:59:35 PM
I will accept the result... it dont really matter about the 3 rounds as it wouldnt have changed the final result ...

If the HLTV was to be sent to the ED admins for their opinions and NOT because we were putting a match conflict in, then we should just accept and carry on.

maybe a pm could be dropped to Daywalker acknowledging the fact that we are aware of the rounds when they broke the rules .. but we accept the result anyway

 <_<
Title: dMw vs gL. on de_dust2_cz
Post by: Whitey on June 16, 2006, 06:12:23 PM
IMO, If we can prove they had two AWP's, we should challenge the result, who knows what else they were doing  :(
Title: dMw vs gL. on de_dust2_cz
Post by: Hippy on June 16, 2006, 06:46:52 PM
those 3 rounds make a lot of difference, 23-7 would get us -10 points i think, where as 20-10 would get us -0
Title: dMw vs gL. on de_dust2_cz
Post by: Doris on June 16, 2006, 07:01:33 PM
every round counts, maybe we should stat buying up on 1st round.