As you know from my coments at our last extended debate was to use a different DKP system for AQ40.
Before it's too late, why not?
I know it might create some attendance problems, but I believe most people still want things from BWL and some even from MC, so why not?
TL.
post its beeing debated again, and lets meet on TS tomorrow 18.30/18.45
I have always said im ready to change the system alltogether, and this might just be a step in the right direction
I'll be online tomorrow for the raid as well and certainly for the talk
I was against a change for what we already have. But I was for changing for AQ40 forwards. That's what we should discuss, changing from AQ40 forwards. We have an attendance requirement, so a new DKP for AQ40 would not kill us.
TL.
Do you mean we should revamp everything in the current system aswell or just change it from the day we decide and forward?
Imo we should have done this before we started AQ40 if we would have but I guess it's not too late.
Well I voted for a retention of the MC/OL/BWL site as is. But I also voted for a new DKP system from AQ40 onwards. It is not too late to extract the AQ40 DKP and dump it onto a new site, but the longer we leave any change the more impractical it is going to become. I am open to discussions about how to change the current DKP system for AQ40 only, so long as it does not leave Luthor anywhere near the top of the DKP pile. :norty:
TL.
QuoteI am open to discussions about how to change the current DKP system for AQ40 only, so long as it does not leave Luthor anywhere near the top of the DKP pile
HUH what hm?
I don't think I'll be very active in the debate except maybe giving out a few opinions and maybe give some facts about the various DKP systems when needed. Cause after the last debate I just cba.
Quote from: Padding;143561HUH what hm?
British humour, sorry :sad:
TL.
Are all british as cheeky as Tony Blair?