Dead Men Walking

Old Server Admin Section => SOG Archive => SOG War Room => Silver Oak Guardians => Archived Topics => Raid Group 2 => Topic started by: DarkAngel on August 27, 2006, 12:23:16 AM

Title: Applications
Post by: DarkAngel on August 27, 2006, 12:23:16 AM
Zwabamanab (Defender/Priest) (http://www.deadmen.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=15611)
 
Yes, all the way :clap:
 
Valdor (Defender/Rogue) (http://www.deadmen.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=15613)
 
Also invite replacing Lumi
 
Lovercraft (Guardian/Defender/Paladin) (http://www.deadmen.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=15610)
 
Not sure, need more information about issues surrounding him. Looking at just his Application and supporters i would.
 
If we invited these 3 all we would need to fill would be our Druid spot....
Title: Applications
Post by: Ubar on August 27, 2006, 09:00:33 AM
Zwabamanab:
i think it is not a bad choose, he has healing done very hight so i say ok
 
Valdor:
not particulary geared but if we need a rogue we can take him, he will take gear things very fast
 
Lovercraft:
we are speaking about him in the other Thread,anyway is ok for me
Title: Applications
Post by: TeaLeaf on August 27, 2006, 12:07:30 PM
Is this a decision?


Invite:
Zwabamanab (Defender/Priest)
Valdor (Defender/Rogue)

If it is then please confirm and we'll get the invites sorted straight away.  You can then focus on the other apps.

TL.
Title: Applications
Post by: DarkAngel on August 27, 2006, 12:12:44 PM
Quote from: TeaLeaf;146128Is this a decision?
 
 
Invite:
Zwabamanab (Defender/Priest)
Valdor (Defender/Rogue)
 
If it is then please confirm and we'll get the invites sorted straight away. You can then focus on the other apps.
 
TL.

I would confirm these two and discuss other.
Title: Applications
Post by: Bastet on August 27, 2006, 03:18:35 PM
luminance doesnt need replacing, he was a 8th rogue where there should be 7, however if the others fail to show up by all means feel free to invite a new one.
Title: Applications
Post by: Sazgul on August 27, 2006, 03:43:00 PM
Quote from: Bastet;146177luminance doesnt need replacing, he was a 8th rogue where there should be 7, however if the others fail to show up by all means feel free to invite a new one.

Was about to write the same... we dont need to replace him. was the 8th rogue. But I feel our rogues, some of them, will soon drop till the attendence req.
Title: Applications
Post by: DarkAngel on August 27, 2006, 08:20:48 PM
Therfore how about have a replacement on and ready?
Title: Applications
Post by: Greatdanes on August 28, 2006, 07:06:36 AM
Any invite send out?
 
Why shall this been done in 1 day now?
 
I have away the hole weekend so I don't have hat the time to look in to this and are in someway surprice over the time this have been giving.
 
But nevermind we do need to act faster sometimes and this priest is one of this times, I think, so :dribble: gib priest :biggrin:
Title: Applications
Post by: DarkAngel on August 28, 2006, 08:17:14 AM
Aye 110% Gib Priest :clap:
Title: Applications
Post by: Siffredi on August 30, 2006, 06:50:22 AM
I think in generel we do need to act faster - because the decision to bring someone in or decline is not so big. Even if they get in and they dont live up to expectaions we can just kick em after trial period... 1 day is very fast but within like 2-3 max we should make the accept/decline decision...
Title: Applications
Post by: Greatdanes on August 30, 2006, 07:04:22 AM
Could we use 5-10 min before every raid to do applications if I continuous gather the applicants in a thread in here so we every Monday and Thursday make a decision about applications?
 
Applicants who comes in on a raid day are first made next raid day...
Title: Applications
Post by: Ubar on August 30, 2006, 08:42:58 AM
ok for me to discuss 5-10 min before raid too.