Dead Men Walking

Old Server Admin Section => Archived Topics => CS Admins => Topic started by: Dr Sadako on May 05, 2007, 05:07:13 PM

Title: TehGavster
Post by: Dr Sadako on May 05, 2007, 05:07:13 PM
Is fraghunting like crazy. I have slayed him at least 5 times the last 2 weeks for it.
What makes me laugh is his constant question "when do I become bravo" ...
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Anonymous on May 05, 2007, 05:10:38 PM
Quote from: Dr Sadako;188003Is fraghunting like crazy. I have slayed him at least 5 times the last 2 weeks for it.
What makes me laugh is his constant question "when do I become bravo" ...

To which my answer is:

When Sadako stops slaying you :devil:
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Whitey on May 05, 2007, 06:13:21 PM
I've already had words but doesn't seem to be doing much good.
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Penfold on May 05, 2007, 07:27:56 PM
It's your call Whitey but why not tell him and give him a temp ban for a week and see if that jolts him into action.

PEN
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Anonymous on May 05, 2007, 07:29:45 PM
Quote from: Penfold;188032It's your call Whitey but why not tell him and give him a temp ban for a week and see if that jolts him into action.

PEN

I think it might be better to say last warning and if it happens again he will get a 1 week ban.
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Penfold on May 05, 2007, 08:44:21 PM
I think it would be better to give him a last warning and it happens again give him a 1 week ban.

PEN

:norty:
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Whitey on May 05, 2007, 09:23:10 PM
I've sent him a PM with the warning that he will be banned for 1 week if he doesn't stop the frag hunting.  Please post here if you are forced into giving him the ban.
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Dr Sadako on May 06, 2007, 04:21:54 PM
Quote from: Whitey;188055I've sent him a PM with the warning that he will be banned for 1 week if he doesn't stop the frag hunting. Please post here if you are forced into giving him the ban.

Any response from him?
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Whitey on May 06, 2007, 09:48:25 PM
Quote from: Dr Sadako;188105Any response from him?

Nope. :eyebrow:
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Blunt on May 06, 2007, 11:28:51 PM
I spotted/was killed by him well away from the action a few times tonight.
they may well have been using distraction tactics, but I somehow don't think so.

one to watch... although, he can play nicely when he wants to.
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Anonymous on May 07, 2007, 12:16:02 AM
Diod you PM him or email him? If you PM'd him I can get his email address from the forum database and send him a bit of a "stiffener"!
Title: TehGavster
Post by: OldBloke on May 07, 2007, 01:02:21 AM
Guys. Do not tolerate idiots. If you can't get a response to a PM then ban and the next move is his.

I'm all for the coaching and education of players showing potential to become good team players but please don't forget that we owe it to the community at large to be strict in cases where the actions of one is spoiling the enjoyment of the majority.

Old 'Zero Tolerance' Bloke
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Whitey on May 07, 2007, 10:34:57 AM
Quote from: BlueBall;188144Diod you PM him or email him? If you PM'd him I can get his email address from the forum database and send him a bit of a "stiffener"!


I sent a PM.  Going by Blunts post, I think the "stiffener" is in order.
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Anonymous on May 07, 2007, 11:02:29 AM
Quote from: Whitey;188169I sent a PM.  Going by Blunts post, I think the "stiffener" is in order.


here is draft. If you are happy with the content then I'll send it to him.
====================================================
QuoteIt is my understanding that several of the admins have been forced to slay/kick you for continually going "fraghunting" instead of defending the objective while playing on our CSS server. It has reached a point where the senior CSS Admin (Whitey) felt compelled to send you a PM regarding your conduct on the server and stated that unless your conduct improves you will receive a ban for 1 week.

It seems that no response to this PM has been received and the admins are now concerned that you are singularly unmoved by our desire for people to play to the server rules for the enjoyment of all.

I therefore urge you to get in contact with Whitey to assure him that you intend to adhere to our standards. All of the admins are volunteers and it spoils their enjoyment of the game when they have to continually admonish you for the same thing again and again. If you feel that you do not understand the rules or the reason for them then please ask as we would much prefer to educate rather than discipline.

Should Whitey not receive a suitable reply by Saturday we will assume that you no longer wish to be part of the community and will consequently remove your access to our servers.

Thank you for taking the time to read through this and I personally hope that you can respond positively to this and be a contributing member to our community.

Regards,

BB
for and on behalf of the admin team.
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Blunt on May 07, 2007, 11:27:54 AM
point of order:
 Not strictly "out of bounds", more like frag hunting on attacking team* when technically there are no bounds.

I know it's a small point, but in a "ticking off" situation it is likely to be denied if not strictly true.

*(this was the case last night with me; other Admins may have different experiences)
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Anonymous on May 07, 2007, 11:32:19 AM
Quote from: Blunt;188181point of order:
 Not strictly "out of bounds", more like frag hunting on attacking team* when technically there are no bounds.

I know it's a small point, but in a "ticking off" situation it is likely to be denied if not strictly true.

*(this was the case last night with me; other Admins may have different experiences)

noted. Will edit draft to reflect this
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Doorman on May 07, 2007, 11:40:04 AM
All this makes us LFS admins seem positively Attila-like. Last night I was on CS:S and someone got filthy mouthed (I hate that sort of thing:rolleyes: ) in text. I said, in my very best 'stentorian' voice, 'That's enough of that language' He replied 'Why, it's English innit?' 'Not here it's not' quoth I, 'You'll get your self banned'. I was mightily impressed when BANG! he was done gone.:byebye:
I was a little less impressed when he came back 5 minutes later. :lmfao: In LFS that was good for a 99 day ban. Maybe we're too hard, but I'm sure that was too soft. What did he learn? Not much I'll be bound.
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Whitey on May 07, 2007, 04:19:07 PM
Quote from: Doorman;188185All this makes us LFS admins seem positively Attila-like. Last night I was on CS:S and someone got filthy mouthed (I hate that sort of thing:rolleyes: ) in text. I said, in my very best 'stentorian' voice, 'That's enough of that language' He replied 'Why, it's English innit?' 'Not here it's not' quoth I, 'You'll get your self banned'. I was mightily impressed when BANG! he was done gone.:byebye:
I was a little less impressed when he came back 5 minutes later. :lmfao: In LFS that was good for a 99 day ban. Maybe we're too hard, but I'm sure that was too soft. What did he learn? Not much I'll be bound.

It was a 30 minute ban and it was a first offence which was followed up by a PM to tell him he would receive a longer (permanent) ban if he did it again.

Nice note BB, that should hopefully do the trick.
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Doorman on May 07, 2007, 05:02:48 PM
Quote from: Whitey;188226It was a 30 minute ban....
Blimey! Don't time fly when you're having fun? :D
Title: TehGavster
Post by: KKND on May 07, 2007, 06:02:52 PM
Quote from: OldBloke;188146Guys. Do not tolerate idiots. If you can't get a response to a PM then ban and the next move is his.

I'm all for the coaching and education of players showing potential to become good team players but please don't forget that we owe it to the community at large to be strict in cases where the actions of one is spoiling the enjoyment of the majority.

Old 'Zero Tolerance' Bloke


Totaly Agree.....
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Whitey on May 07, 2007, 09:42:56 PM
QuoteAlthough i do NOT recall you personally warning me of fraghunting, i understand where your coming from. I will admid, although usually i stray to the opposite site from the team (mainly to cause a distraction, and to buy them time) i apoligize if it may have been mistaken as frag hunting, (and yeah ill admit, now and then i have been more focoused on killing but those moments are a rarity).

Instance 1: i voiced the rest of the team, notifying them that i would venture to the other bomb site as a decoy. (which worked) and they agreed, i then said i would come round the other side to the same site as the team, and i had come up behind several enemies... so i did what anyone would DO, i killed them on sight... and was then slayed for it.. i could hardly ignore them and just run round to the other side. it was within my best interest to kill them to protect the site.

However. i understand and am usually very good with obaying the rules, and have never been kicked for any rule breaking, for the several months i have played in the Boomer Server.

Sorry for the long pm, but just a few things that i thought should be heard, but from now on, i will follow the objective MORE closely.

Thanks

tehGavster

This is the reply I received this evening.
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Anonymous on May 07, 2007, 09:48:28 PM
I would say that was a bit of a result :)

He was on Boomer earlier tonight and he was complaining about people being out of bounds! :roflmao:
Title: TehGavster
Post by: DuVeL on May 07, 2007, 09:49:30 PM
A very nice reply if I may say so.
I played with him tonight and because of some good VC's on his side and listning to calls he played correctly according to TCSways.
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Penfold on May 07, 2007, 10:13:36 PM
:withstupid:

ditto tonight
Title: TehGavster
Post by: OldBloke on May 07, 2007, 10:27:02 PM
Told you he was a bad 'un.

Title: TehGavster
Post by: Blunt on May 07, 2007, 10:56:33 PM
Quote from: Blunt;188138I spotted/was killed by him well away from the action a few times tonight.
they may well have been using distraction tactics, but I somehow don't think so.

one to watch... although, he can play nicely when he wants to.

oooh, quoting meself I am now:rolleyes:

But an all round result for dmw I'd say:D

:dmw:

Well played BB & Whitey
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Dr Sadako on May 08, 2007, 07:38:03 AM
:sad:  This means I don't get to slay him? :narnar: :byebye:
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Bastet on May 15, 2007, 04:36:35 PM
By all means feel free to slay him, Marduk was severly ****ed last nite when him and Gray Fox where talking so much on the comms that no1 else could get a word in, now if it was mostly tactical i wouldnt be writing this post, but if i wanted to know what was on TV for them i would rather check the news paper then hear minute by minute updates. Tbh, if i had had my computer at home i woulda banned em for a hour or so for voice comm abuse.
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Dr Sadako on May 15, 2007, 04:54:37 PM
Quote from: Bastet;189757By all means feel free to slay him, Marduk was severly ****ed last nite when him and Gray Fox where talking so much on the comms that no1 else could get a word in, now if it was mostly tactical i wouldnt be writing this post, but if i wanted to know what was on TV for them i would rather check the news paper then hear minute by minute updates. Tbh, if i had had my computer at home i woulda banned em for a hour or so for voice comm abuse.

I told them over voice to stop it. Gray Fox stopped almost immediately but Teh Gavester kept going for a few minutes. It was quite annoying.
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Bastet on May 15, 2007, 05:00:35 PM
I talked some more w/ duk and SoonJung today, and apperantly both of them (jokingly ?!) got called racists. Now i dont know about you lot, but i feel like moving for a fairly strong banstick.
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Whitey on May 15, 2007, 05:04:28 PM
I will send a PM to both of them with a warning.
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Blunt on May 15, 2007, 05:10:53 PM
I sent a private chat message to gav asking him to stop spamming vc.
he did eventually stop, but it was v. annoying.
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Bastet on May 15, 2007, 05:39:20 PM
Quote from: Whitey;189764I will send a PM to both of them with a warning.

In my opion they allready had fair warning, and id give em a week or so to cool off. But that might just be me, I react very poorly to ppl messing w/ the Duck and SoonJung (or other ppl i care about)
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Whitey on May 15, 2007, 06:05:41 PM
The message has been sent and if anyone feels they have crossed the line again then please feel free to issue a 1 week ban and let me know.
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Dr Sadako on May 17, 2007, 09:28:34 PM
Quote from: Whitey;189788The message has been sent and if anyone feels they have crossed the line again then please feel free to issue a 1 week ban and let me know.

Gav and Grey fox kept chatting over VC constantly. Made SoonJong leave the server because of it. I told them to stop via admin message.
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Whitey on May 17, 2007, 10:13:44 PM
Do we have a record of their steam ID's?  :angry:
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Dr Sadako on May 17, 2007, 11:16:24 PM
Gray Fox][No Radar<1622>
tehGavster[úK]<1168>
Title: TehGavster
Post by: Whitey on May 17, 2007, 11:26:48 PM
A one week ban has been issued to them both along with a PM to explain why, hopefully it will get the message through.