Dead Men Walking

Old Server Admin Section => DMR Council => Game Admins => Archived Topics => Member Issues & Recruitment => Topic started by: Bastet on November 17, 2007, 07:05:08 PM

Title: Marduk & Holypwnzor
Post by: Bastet on November 17, 2007, 07:05:08 PM
Marduk over Holypwnzor:
 
QuoteId like to file a complaint about this boy
He clearly does not have a mature attitude
lacks a sence of humor
and worst of all has something to nag about always it seems, Boost me, Help me, and stupid questions about the patch

Sog is a mature guild, not a daycare facility

~duck~

Holypwnzor over Marduk:
 
Quoteok, i have been putting up with this since patch 2.3 day, and i only skim read the patch notes for pallys and shammys and when people in guild chat say something thats new in 2.3 i say "Wow wicked i never seen that before" (if its something i've found)
And he says "maybe you should of read the patch notes" or "Hey holy (blah blah blah blah) on the patch notes" and tonight he said "hey holy theres a new spelling for 3rd that was in the patch notes"

And that jus right ****ed me off (sorry for the language) and i'm just SICK to DEATH of him saying that

Thanks Holypwnzor

Id smack em both and tell em to grow up and be done with it, but since its PMed to me i am obligated to post here.
Title: Marduk & Holypwnzor
Post by: Lucian on November 17, 2007, 11:51:37 PM
I'm with Duk on this one - Holy bailed on a botanica run on me.  I was quite annoyed.  He seems childish.
Title: Marduk & Holypwnzor
Post by: TeaLeaf on November 18, 2007, 08:31:20 AM
What were the circumstances of the bail Lucian.....?

Re the comments from both, I can imagine that both have rubbed each other up the wrong way.  Duk's got a dry sense of humour with a decent layer of sarchasm and once he latches on to soemone they rarely escape.  Holypwnzor cleared said something to irritate Duk int he first place and it escalated from there.

I'm with Bastet, knock the heads, tell them both to behave and move on.

TL.
Title: Marduk & Holypwnzor
Post by: Lucian on November 18, 2007, 09:11:05 AM
Bail: had a group ready, summoned him as MT, entered instance, one member went offline, he went offline.  Might have been one member was saved and needed replacing, but even so he just vanished without explanation and arrived back in 10 minutes by which time we'd replaced and started.
Title: Marduk & Holypwnzor
Post by: Soon Jung on November 18, 2007, 10:15:27 AM
Hit in the noggin and move on.
Title: Marduk & Holypwnzor
Post by: spiritus on November 18, 2007, 10:56:36 AM
got the same pm from holy. but i'm with bastet. smack, and tell them to move allong.
Title: Marduk & Holypwnzor
Post by: TeaLeaf on November 18, 2007, 03:04:48 PM
Quote from: Lucian;213337Bail: had a group ready, summoned him as MT, entered instance, one member went offline, he went offline.  Might have been one member was saved and needed replacing, but even so he just vanished without explanation and arrived back in 10 minutes by which time we'd replaced and started.
That's not quite the same as bailing from a run.  Irritating yes, but not a bail.

TL.
Title: Marduk & Holypwnzor
Post by: sheepy on November 18, 2007, 05:06:59 PM
has anyone mentioned anything to them yet?

Ive been awayforacouple of days
Title: Marduk & Holypwnzor
Post by: Othbarty on November 19, 2007, 01:16:15 PM
I agree with TL, 10 minutes is usually OK to wait if the run hasnt started yet. (imo) annoying yes, but if something happened with the network, 10 mins. quickly passes...
Title: Marduk & Holypwnzor
Post by: spiritus on November 19, 2007, 01:54:38 PM
Quote from: sheepy;213362has anyone mentioned anything to them yet?
 
Ive been awayforacouple of days
I've not talked about this case to anyone of them.
I know Holy sendt a pm to most of the offisers, and i also forwarded it to ellie and oth.
Title: Marduk & Holypwnzor
Post by: TeaLeaf on November 19, 2007, 04:29:37 PM
Someone needs to go back and close the issue with them.  Be diplomatic & firm with both.  Point out both sides to each.

TL.
Title: Marduk & Holypwnzor
Post by: spiritus on November 19, 2007, 07:28:45 PM
sorted in officer meeting about this tonight.