....she certainly does now. :sideways:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7558764.stm
PEN
Wow, what a S*** child he's raised. I'd slap her too.
I don't get our system for protecting children. A caution (i.e no actual charges pressed) and you're never allowed to work with children again...but if you're a catholic priest with no charges people are still happy to hand over their kids so long as the pope appologises every now and again.
Quote from: Penfold;241023....she certainly does now.
:withstupid:
Hey, that's not on. You can't condone slapping.
He should have punched her in the kidneys and denied it. She has thin lips. You can't trust people with thin lips.
a short length of rubber hose doesn't leave bruises:eyebrow:
nasty brat! ruining his career :blink:
then again, my parents put mustard in my mouth as a young un when i swore. Is it too late to file a complaint?
back in the day it was allowed to hit children?
Why aren't you allowed to slap your children anymore? I know beating them to a pulp and claiming they fell down the stairs is a moral grey area, but a smack when they're naughty is no more emotionally harmful than shouting at them constantly. Applied right you won't have to do it very often, compared to shouting at them.
Every time I give my lad a clip round the ear I wonder if I'd get reported by some a**hole do-gooder for doing so.
T-Bag, I do agree.
I think constant shouting is worse than the quick smack (which hasn't turned me into a psycho).
Quote from: Jewelz^;241079back in the day it was allowed to hit children?
Yup, 'back in the day' a visit to the headmasters office would probably mean a caning, a policeman could clip you around the back of the head and a parent smacking a naughty child did not result in complete strangers questioning their right to be a parent.
The "You can't touch me" part of the current generation make me sick.
Beating (as in punching and kicking) a child is wrong, its abuse and so too is over use of physical punishment, yes, but a smack or slap is a short sharp shock to the system and is designed to inflict an immediate short term response and re-enforcement to a deliberate breaking of a rule that the child was fully aware of and is not meant to inflict any damage. Watch wildlife programs, cubs and such that aren't behaving are given a nip or a push, you don't see them take the cub aside and quietly have a "Mummy doesn't like it when you're naughty, it makes her cry" talk.
It's physics, equal and opposite reaction stuff.
So basically, those who don't smack their kids are breaking the laws of physics and are going to cause the universe to implode on itself. Already the horsemen of the apocalypse are all around us (Hoodies) and I think their appearance can be directly liked back to not being smacked by the parents.
Okay, some kids do respond to vocal restraint and removal of luxuries, good, job done, but some will just ignore it and sterner measures need to be available.
When it comes down to it, it's the parents choice (within reason) as to how to punish their child, taking that choice away from them and then making the parent responsible for everything the kid does in the eyes of the law is just stupid in my view.
When I was a kid my old man used to hit us with the end of his belt, sounds really bad doesn't it. Some do gooder would go up the wall and call the cops etc...
Then you look into the reason my dad is such a big man that if he had hit us with his hand the damage would be much worse than a short slap on the leg from the belt. Which shocked more than it hurt.
Plus it only happened when I stepped well out of line and when I had done something bad enough and got caught I knew it was coming and new I had to pay the price.
Also my kid brother learnt from my mistakes and kept well out of trouble so he never needed to be disciplined.
Therefore, I learnt from an early age about right and wrong and if you do wrong you are punished.
I also learnt if you climb on the school roof and try to get in through the skylight someone WILL see you and ring your parents.. Be warned ;)
Hug A Hoodie
Silly sod. He should have told the cops she pulled a knife on him. Knife crime trumps kid-slapping in the eyes of the tabloids^W law these days.
:lmfao:
PEN
Quote from: DogMeat;241099Silly sod. He should have told the cops she pulled a knife on him. Knife crime trumps kid-slapping in the eyes of the tabloids^W law these days.
But then she'd say he had a large stone.
Stone wins over sharp implements :)
If he'd had a large stone, she wouldn't have been talking to anybody any more...
No no your all wrong a bar of soap in a sock prison style coz thats where she is gonna end up the little chav... The police are mad this is why the chav's are killing each other, no respect,gonna stop now its making me mad :ranting2:
Quote from: Venom;241093I also learnt if you climb on the school roof and try to get in through the skylight someone WILL see you and ring your parents.. Be warned ;)
Shame really.
She did deserve it though. Although, how she got to that stage in the first place should be questioned :eyebrow:
alot of teenagers today are stereotyped as being a chav.. alot of people do it to me.. if im a chav then, well im a nice chav? :narnar:
Jewelz you maybe be a nice chav but i dont think you fall in to the chav thing,i think you know right from wrong,to be a chav you have to hang around a bus stops or a takeaway and not give a s**t about anything or anybody,
On my way home from work today i saw a load of "chav.s" out side a takeaway bike's all over the path and a woman with a pram and she had to take the pram on to a busy road to go around them while that shouted abuse at her.... now tell me would you and mates do that to someone ????? :narnar:
School is where ya used to learn ya discipline
but since the early 80's the board duster and detention meant nought
shame cos it worked with me.
Fatbob (only child no-one but school and a mam to show me the ropes)
Worked out ok i think.. respect means different now than it used too
so sad..... and a legacy for a generation's too boot
FB