QuoteOriginally posted by Sadako@Sep 5 2003, 09:26 AMMy understanding is that the full version is just cosmetically changed so how would that aid gameplay?
Update to full version or yank! :ph34r:
QuoteOriginally posted by OldBloke@Sep 5 2003, 10:29 AMIt is? I thought they had changed some stuff. If so ... yank it and while you are at it remove thunder. Add nuke and vegas.
My understanding is that the full version is just cosmetically changed so how would that aid gameplay?
QuoteOriginally posted by Sadako+Sep 5 2003, 08:43 AM-->
QUOTE (Sadako @ Sep 5 2003, 08:43 AM) | ||
Title: Shogun
Post by: Dr Sadako on September 05, 2003, 10:31:27 AM
You have to have 10 CTs against 6 Ts to make it "even" and only 25% of the map is actually used. Another problem is that people drop due to different versions of the map and they can't make it work.
Think there are better hostage maps than that one. My five
Title: Shogun
Post by: Zok on September 05, 2003, 11:59:09 AM QuoteOriginally posted by Sadako@Sep 5 2003, 09:31 AMI will agree that the majority of the map is not used, this is due to PCS boundaries rather than the map being poor. The fact that so little of the map is used though shouldn’t really be an issue as the game play centres around the hostages. As to the teams having to be balanced to allow good play I think actually adds to some maps, and enhances the realism of the situation, (“we have a situation where 6 terrorists have taken hostages, send in 6 of our special forcesâ€) personally I would send in more CT’s to rescue the hossies. While this may not be the best hostage map it does play differently to a lot of other maps, otherwise we would be playing the same strategy on aesthetically different maps rather than tactically different maps. my five
Title: Shogun
Post by: smilodon on September 05, 2003, 12:05:36 PM
Maybe we need an early new map vote type thing ?
Title: Shogun
Post by: Doorman on September 05, 2003, 12:07:15 PM QuoteOriginally posted by Zok+Sep 5 2003, 11:59 AM-->
|