QuoteOriginally posted by albert@Sep 17 2003, 01:17 PMThat applies even more so to that pile of crack-smoking-monkey poo called steam...
it should be banned until such time as it is declared stable, if it ever does
QuoteOriginally posted by DogMeat+Sep 17 2003, 12:23 PM-->
| QUOTE (DogMeat @ Sep 17 2003, 12:23 PM) |
|
Title: 1.6 Shield Bugs
Post by: Dr Sadako on September 22, 2003, 12:57:08 PM
So how do we stand on the Shield Issue. Allow or not?
Me says: No (until fix is out)
Title: 1.6 Shield Bugs
Post by: TeaLeaf on September 22, 2003, 02:24:51 PM
I thought that this was the way we were challenging at the moment anyway? 'no shields'
TL.
Title: 1.6 Shield Bugs
Post by: Dr Sadako on September 22, 2003, 02:29:28 PM QuoteOriginally posted by TeaLeaf@Sep 22 2003, 03:24 PMI mean for the Hook as well.
Title: 1.6 Shield Bugs
Post by: TeaLeaf on September 22, 2003, 05:03:57 PM
Personally I'm not so worried about it on the Hook. I'd be happy with shields for the timebeing as I get to spend more than enough time dead and watching other people play. Kinda like Valve's VAC system only I am first-hand and I don't crash ;)
TL.
Title: 1.6 Shield Bugs
Post by: albert on September 22, 2003, 05:04:38 PM
I vote no, too many bugs at this point in time, and I get sick of DA shooting me through an active sheild on Aztec. ;)
Title: 1.6 Shield Bugs
Post by: JonnyAppleSeed on September 22, 2003, 07:05:31 PM
<_< without a full ban on shields i think it would be very hard to control..but i do like them :huh:
|