So i was a little bored with FSW, so i bought X plane 11 (will prob buy P3D when it goes to 64 bit), so i thought i would do some comparison shots, FSW and XPlane are out of the box, FSX SE has Orbx global, Orbx vector, Orbx NA land class , Orbx pacific north West, and using the Carenardo 344.
FSW approach to Seattle
(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a28/canaryworf/20170519153207_1_zps64elb1f5.jpg) (http://s8.photobucket.com/user/canaryworf/media/20170519153207_1_zps64elb1f5.jpg.html)
fsx approach to Seattle
(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a28/canaryworf/20170520095330_1_zpssgjzwbqx.jpg) (http://s8.photobucket.com/user/canaryworf/media/20170520095330_1_zpssgjzwbqx.jpg.html)
xplane
(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a28/canaryworf/Cessna_172SP_1_zps0ioc0xmh.png) (http://s8.photobucket.com/user/canaryworf/media/Cessna_172SP_1_zps0ioc0xmh.png.html)
and the same order at dusk
FSW
(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a28/canaryworf/20170520095957_1_zps3cieehhm.jpg) (http://s8.photobucket.com/user/canaryworf/media/20170520095957_1_zps3cieehhm.jpg.html)
FSX SE
(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a28/canaryworf/20170520095431_1_zpskvwzzlxe.jpg) (http://s8.photobucket.com/user/canaryworf/media/20170520095431_1_zpskvwzzlxe.jpg.html)
Xplane 11
(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a28/canaryworf/Cessna_172SP_2_zpsnv2m8vio.png) (http://s8.photobucket.com/user/canaryworf/media/Cessna_172SP_2_zpsnv2m8vio.png.html)
i prefer the scenary on Xplane, but i think the planes are still to basic. FSW looks lovely, but shy away from the popular areas and the FSX out of the box repeating scenary happens. FSX SE although not as pretty as the rest, it still seems a lot better than XP..mainly for ease of use and more addons, and hasn't got the tile repeat like FSW. I do have a some free xp scenary and aircraft to try, so as arnie says "ill be back"
Nice comparison.
I really love the curved runways of Xplane.