Dead Men Walking

dMw vs UKE on de_dust2

02/02/2004  at  20:00  on  BALDRIC

Result: 10 - 14


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Kills Deaths
Terrorist Forces 7 5

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
-=[dMw]=-FATAL 15 6
-=[dMw]=-DuVeL 12 7
-=[dMw]=-TeaLeaf 8 10
-=[dMw]=-Sadako 7 9
-=[dMw]=-FatBob 0 0
 
CT Forces 3 9

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
-=[dMw]=-FatBob 10 10
-=[dMw]=-DuVeL 7 10
-=[dMw]=-TeaLeaf 7 10
-=[dMw]=-Sadako 5 8
-=[dMw]=-FATAL 4 10
 
 
Match Notes:
 
A very patient team who as T walked everywhere, prodded, shot someone and backed off. Then walked somewhere else, shot another CT and then backed off. After a few goes of this they had usually chewed through 2 or 3 of us and then attacked the weaker site. They used practically the whole time in each round. They didn't finalise their attack until quite late in the round, waiting to see how many of us died first. As CT they set their 2 best players at B, one shooting through the doors, the other in amongst the boxes on the raised area. The peeps through the double doors shot most of us as we entered the bombsite, very quick reflexes indeed :eek: The peeps at A were their weaker 3 and they positioned them all up amongst the boxes with one on the bombsite itself, one in the open area next to the bomb site towards short A and the other as the Ts look at it from the left hand box at the top of the ramp. FB dropped after we lost the crucial round and we won most of the rounds after that! Is there a message there ;) We'd play them again but we would have to be real patient. TL.

Bombspot A has to less coverage, got overrun a couple of times there. First 3 round as CT went well. For the rest: What TL said.

unlucky guys

Unlucky guys. Sounds like it was a good match though.

I think the result doesn't reflect how close some rounds were. I think we could have won the match if some of those rounds had gon our way instead of theirs.

In retrospect for the last 3 matches I have played on dust2 with 5vs5 is that we should skip the middle CT. Yesterday they attacked A 10 of 12 rounds. We only won 1 round at A and the other 2 at B. I think that shows we need to rethink the strategy for A.

A suggestion is to have 2 A, 1 short A and 2 B. They short A player should rush there and it is the CT first out of spawn going to A. If we lose the short A guy we still have 2 players at A.

We can experiment a lot this week as we have 5 matches in a row on dust2. :)

QuoteOriginally posted by Sadako@Feb 3 2004, 09:45 AM
A suggestion is to have 2 A, 1 short A and 2 B. They short A player should rush there and it is the CT first out of spawn going to A. If we lose the short A guy we still have 2 players at A.

We can experiment a lot this week as we have 5 matches in a row on dust2. :)

I've noticed the dust2 maps at ED aswell. Try it I should say.

Well noticed.

QuoteOriginally posted by DuVeL+Feb 3 2004, 11:28 AM-->