Text only | Text with Images

Dead Men Walking

Old Server Admin Section => Admin - TCS Admins => Archived Topics => Bravo Company Applications => Topic started by: OldBloke on August 27, 2004, 09:30:06 AM

Poll
Question: Grant membership of Bravo to King?
Option 1: votes: 0
Title: King - YES - 28/8/2004
Post by: OldBloke on August 27, 2004, 09:30:06 AM
QuoteHello admins here i am again.
By this way i would like to aplay for the Brave Company again. I hope that this time you can make me happy.
For now i am going on my hollyday, so i will not be here for three weeks.When i come back i hope you will have some good news for me.
 
 
 
Looking forward to hear from you,  King

Previous application. (http://forum.deadmen.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=6539)
Title: King - YES - 28/8/2004
Post by: Dr Sadako on August 27, 2004, 09:36:53 AM
Yes from me. I think he has improved a lot and he is playing TCS in a good fashion. He is frequently on both the CS and CZ server. He posts more on the forums. Is his English improving or is it as bad as DuVeLs? ;)
Title: King - YES - 28/8/2004
Post by: Anonymous on August 27, 2004, 09:46:11 AM
Null vote from me. I haven't seen him on servers so cannot comment one way or the other. He seems active in the forums although I'm not sure about the quality/relevance of the posts (then again me looks at GFK and BB  :lmfao: )
Title: King - YES - 28/8/2004
Post by: Gh0st Face Killah on August 27, 2004, 11:58:07 AM
Yes from me for the same reasons Sadako gave.
Title: King - YES - 28/8/2004
Post by: Doorman on August 27, 2004, 01:54:32 PM
Afraid I gave him a 'no'. Simply because I cannot recall seeing him on the servers lately. Or do his appearances coincide with his applications?
Title: King - YES - 28/8/2004
Post by: Dr Sadako on August 27, 2004, 02:42:16 PM
QuoteOriginally posted by Doorman@Aug 27 2004, 01:54 PM
Afraid I gave him a 'no'. Simply because I cannot recall seeing him on the servers lately. Or do his appearances coincide with his applications?
... or it could be that you and BB are rarely on the servers. ;)
Title: King - YES - 28/8/2004
Post by: Doorman on August 27, 2004, 04:45:09 PM
QuoteOriginally posted by Sadako+Aug 27 2004, 02:42 PM-->
QUOTE (Sadako @ Aug 27 2004, 02:42 PM)
Title: King - YES - 28/8/2004
Post by: smite on August 27, 2004, 05:16:34 PM
Null from me.

I havn't been on a lot but also NEVER seen him on when i do play.

So cannot comment
Title: King - YES - 28/8/2004
Post by: smilodon on August 27, 2004, 06:16:23 PM
Nope from me. He seems to be heading towards a yes vote but there you go. I appear to be a miserable bugger who isn't that happy about the recent influx of young Bravo's. They litter the forum with dross and are bordering on being a liabilty with their antics on other servers and in other forums while using the -=[dMw]=- tag.

That or I've had a crap week and am in a ratty mood ?
Title: King - YES - 28/8/2004
Post by: OldBloke on August 27, 2004, 06:40:37 PM
QuoteOriginally posted by smilodon@Aug 27 2004, 06:16 PM
... I appear to be a miserable bugger who isn't that happy about the recent influx of young Bravo's.
I thought King was Duvel's *older* brother. I know he has a young child. :blink:
Title: King - YES - 28/8/2004
Post by: smilodon on August 27, 2004, 06:54:48 PM
If he'a an adult then he has even less excuse.
Title: King - YES - 28/8/2004
Post by: OldBloke on August 27, 2004, 06:56:14 PM
QuoteOriginally posted by smilodon@Aug 27 2004, 06:54 PM
If he'a an adult then he has even less excuse.
...for what?
Title: King - YES - 28/8/2004
Post by: Anonymous on August 27, 2004, 07:25:39 PM
I refer the honourable OB to the aforementioned persons last post which may explain this:

QuoteOriginally posted by smilodon@Aug 27 2004, 06:16 PM
That or I've had a crap week and am in a ratty mood ?
Title: King - YES - 28/8/2004
Post by: smilodon on August 27, 2004, 10:59:07 PM
QuoteOriginally posted by OldBloke+Aug 27 2004, 06:56 PM-->
QUOTE (OldBloke @ Aug 27 2004, 06:56 PM)
Title: King - YES - 28/8/2004
Post by: OldBloke on August 28, 2004, 09:33:31 AM
There's an obvious pattern here to the voting. People who play early evening have seen King many times on both CS and CZ servers and have voted 'Yes'.

You guys who tend to play later are, quite rightly, null or 'no' voting.

I would hate to refuse a potentialy good Bravo member just because he appears to only be able to play early in the evening. In fact, that's a bonus for us as we strive for full servers.

So, on my head be it, I'm going to let him in on the grounds that five admins have voted 'yes' and, due to his playing times, he's unlikely to attract any more positive votes.

Thanks Gents.
Title: King - YES - 28/8/2004
Post by: TeaLeaf on August 28, 2004, 10:06:33 AM
We have another 6 days to vote yet......!
And I missed this thread somehow :(

Am I too late or can I still vote...?

T'Blind'L.
Title: King - YES - 28/8/2004
Post by: OldBloke on August 28, 2004, 10:28:56 AM
Apologies TL. With seven votes and a couple of 'nulls' I assumed all votes were in  :blush:
Title: King - YES - 28/8/2004
Post by: Anonymous on August 28, 2004, 10:46:57 AM
QuoteOriginally posted by OldBloke@Aug 28 2004, 09:33 AM
There's an obvious pattern here to the voting. People who play early evening have seen King many times on both CS and CZ servers and have voted 'Yes'.

You guys who tend to play later are, quite rightly, null or 'no' voting.

I would hate to refuse a potentialy good Bravo member just because he appears to only be able to play early in the evening. In fact, that's a bonus for us as we strive for full servers.

So, on my head be it, I'm going to let him in on the grounds that five admins have voted 'yes' and, due to his playing times, he's unlikely to attract any more positive votes.

Thanks Gents.
Good point OB. It is difficult to monitor playing patterns of people but maybe we need to think of some way to include this in future. The null/no option to me seems the best. I know that some people have said in the past that they could not see any difference between the two. I have always felt that there is a very definite difference between the two and the difference is down to "opinion":
Choosing NULL means that you have no preference one way or the other or do not have enough info to make a judgement.
Voting NO means that there is no way you would let this h4xing scumbag into our nice clean community.

I guess that if people haven't seen someone on the servers then we need to vote null and then maybe have a quick discussion after the votes are counted as to the reasons.

My 2p, what do others think?
Title: King - YES - 28/8/2004
Post by: smite on August 28, 2004, 10:51:12 AM
QuoteVoting NO means that there is no way you would let this h4xing scumbag into our nice clean community.

Don't forget the "NO ...Not yet" that is also quite important.  :winkiss:
Title: King - YES - 28/8/2004
Post by: Anonymous on August 28, 2004, 10:55:05 AM
Maybe we need to change the vote options then. Rather than YES/NO/NULL what about:

YES / NOT YET - REAPPLY LATER / NO / NO OPINION (Null)

or some variation on the above
Text only | Text with Images