Mage Guardian

kregoron · May 15, 2006, 07:16:45 PM

may i ask why you are upagrading a mage, then we will be 4 in rg1 raids.. Officers 2 and 2 guardians... so if you upgrade we will have 5 and have to fight for spots..

TeaLeaf · May 15, 2006, 11:13:13 PM

5 per class.

TL.

kregoron · May 16, 2006, 12:16:15 AM

QuoteOriginally posted by TeaLeaf@May 15 2006, 11:13 PM
5 per class.

TL.
[post=127048]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

ye atm teaelle, kreuz, snowstormer, rutski and me.. thats 5 ?

im just asking cause im wondering...

Bastet · May 16, 2006, 07:56:41 AM

Split off, please keep the upgrade thread about upgrades only please

Bob · May 16, 2006, 08:06:51 AM

QuoteOriginally posted by TeaLeaf@May 15 2006, 11:13 PM
5 per class.

TL.
[post=127048]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

I thought there were supposed to be 6 guardians of each class? to be able to handle that folks don't need 100% attendance :huh:

Padding · May 16, 2006, 08:57:01 AM

Yes its 6 pr. class as guardians. 5 pr. raid in general since nobody has a 100% attendance

JanuZ · May 16, 2006, 11:45:39 AM

Just look at this scenario, Teaelle is leading RG2 and Rutski has RL emergency suddenly only 3mages in the raid and you have made majordomo 3x as hard as he should be. As a standard you want to have atleast 4 of each class in a raid. If everyone had exactly 66% attendance wich is the minimum and to have a balanced raid(5 of each class) you would require 60guardians to round it out we say 56 or 64 that is 7-8 of each class. If everyone has 80% attendance you will need 50 to round out again at 48 or 6guardians of each class. So if mages have an average of 80% attendance you need 6guardians

Its simple you want small competition for raid spots since you will never have 100% attendance and with 6guardians of all classes it is only 8 out of 48 that will not be in the raid with almost guaranteed 3-5 not being able to raid the queue should never be longer then 3-5. That also requires 80% attendance from all members to get a full raid.

Snowstormer · May 16, 2006, 01:49:31 PM

I dont like competition, means there will always be 1 person left out. Plus, two of the mages in raids of 5 are officers, means we will have 4 people competing for 3 spots, instead of 6 competing for 5. We have always had enough mages in raids for now, anyway.

TeaLeaf · May 16, 2006, 01:55:57 PM

QuoteOriginally posted by Snowstormer@May 16 2006, 01:49 PM
We have always had enough mages in raids for now, anyway.

And that's the bit the Officers need to decide on which is why it said "possibly".

TL.

Snowstormer · May 16, 2006, 04:10:09 PM

Its still under discussion? Thats glad to hear.

kregoron · May 25, 2006, 07:24:42 PM

QuoteThe following classes are needed for RG1:

Druid (1)
Mage (1)
Warlock (2)

Sorry for seeming like a whining tarhead.. but we are 5 already?
Teaelle Kreuz Snowstormer Rutski and me.. might be me thats shitty @ math but...

sorry if it seems like im mr scary pants.. but i play to raid, if cant raid what to do then

i know that sometimes officers help out in RG2 but arent they supposed to learn to go alone.. so then we will have to many mages... or correct me please if im wrong..

KreuZ · May 25, 2006, 10:48:52 PM

Well as far as I know there's always been 6 guardians per class hasn't it? Except priests who are 7 because of special conditions, so why shouldn't it be the same for Mages?

Edit: Typo's.

kregoron · May 25, 2006, 11:01:29 PM

hmmm might just be me thats wrong..