Charles and Camilla

Started by A Twig, February 11, 2005, 05:14:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Vincentvega

QuoteOriginally posted by Doorman@Feb 11 2005, 07:16 PM
I can't get it up these days much less KEEP it up!
[post=77017]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]
sorry to here that ron :whistle:
If fortune favours the brave....here\'s a quid

MAD_ness

QuoteOriginally posted by Doorman@Feb 11 2005, 07:16 PM
I can't get it up these days much less KEEP it up!
[post=77017]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]


 :lmfao:  :lmfao:

 :blink:
I really was not born to work ALL my life !!!!!

TeaLeaf

Bringing the thread back to some sense of normality:

If person A announces their engagement to person B then it may warrant some congratulations from their compatriates.  Nobody, of whichever family, should have to put up with the sniping from the piblic or press, netierh of whom knwo the first thing about them.  

Let he who is innocent cast the first stone.........

I wish all couples the best of luck.

TL.
TL.
Wisdom doesn\'t necessarily come with age. Sometimes age just shows up all by itself.  (Tom Wilson)
Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships. (Michael Jordan)

MAD_ness

I didn't really care about anything to do with the Royal family before  





care even less now !!!


 ;)
I really was not born to work ALL my life !!!!!

A Twig

QuoteOriginally posted by BlueBall@Feb 11 2005, 06:46 PM
The first Tudor King, Henry VII, descended from Edward III, descended from Edward II, descended from Edward I, descended from Henry III, descended from John, descended from Stephen, Descended from William the Conqueror (Quod Erat Demonstrandum)

Even Harolds lineage is dodgy as he was descended from Harald Bluetooth King of Denmark!
[post=77008]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

Henry VII had no direct blood claim to the throne - as Burke's peerage puts it:

QuoteEarl of Richmond in s. to his father, 3 Nov 1456, King of England by conquest

Therefore not really related to Willy Conk AFAIK

Info on his father.

His father was Edmund Tudor, a Welshman of Welsh royal lineage, but that was not too important as far as his claim to the English throne went. What was important though was his heritage through his mother, Margaret Beaufort, a descendant of Edward III. This descent from King Edward was through his third son, John of Guant. John's third wife, Katherine Swynford had borne him several children as his mistress before he married her. The children born before the marriage were later legitmized, but barred from the succession. Margaret Beaufort was descended from one of the children born before the marriage of John and Katherine. The family Beaufort name being lost through the marriage, thus he is English, as his tie to the royal bloodline is by merit of an "in-law" status...
[N~@] - Ninja Association
Although we may fade from life, life does not fade from our memories


Dingo

QuoteOriginally posted by BlueBall@Feb 11 2005, 06:46 PM
Even Harolds lineage is dodgy as he was descended from Harald Bluetooth King of Denmark!
[post=77008]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

Which obviously means that the Danes were overun by the Swedes (Vikings) so in fact Dr Sadako should be the next King of England....makes sense to me, he is a Doctor after all?!! <_<  :D
semper in merda solus profundum variare
http://www.geocities.com/arnoldsounds/whoami.wav