The Da Vinci Code

[Gh0st Face Killah]

For those who have/haven't read it I recommend Angels and Demons by the same author (Dan Brown), far better book imho.

[suicidal_monkey]

reading it at the moment, having just finished another one by the same guy called Digital Fortress.

Easy reading, but I do find his writing occasionally treats you like a simpleton, and seems to have to force in explanations of things. He also gets things wrong every now and then little details, but then I can be a pedant if I want

[Anonymous]

Originally posted by suicidal_monkey@Feb 23 2005, 03:49 PM
He also gets things wrong every now and then little details, but then I can be a pedant if I want

[post=78164]Quoted post[/post]

[/b]

Shouldn't that be "if I want to be"  :whistle:

[Benny]

http://www.tacticalgamer.com/showthread.ph...highlight=vinci

[ChimpBoy]

If you like this book try "The Rule of Four"

Similar subject.  Much better book.

[suicidal_monkey]

Originally posted by BlueBall@Feb 23 2005, 04:01 PM
Shouldn't that be "if I want to be" :whistle:

[post=78165]Quoted post[/post]

[/b]

not necessarily. I can be a choosy with what I am pedantic about, if I want :narnar:


...but perhaps it should have a "to be" on the end (not a "not to be", that would just be silly)



...anyway, should you not avoid using apostrophes to abbreviate words when attempting to stick to "proper" grammer? :unsure:

edit: Questions should also end in a question mark, should they not?

[Anonymous]

"?"

 :narnar:

[suicidal_monkey]

:devil:

[Gh0st Face Killah]

Reading Digital Fortress myself atm. Its ok but not as good as the other two.

[smilodon]

Isn't "The Da Vinci Code" all that nonsense about the Holy Grail?

[Gh0st Face Killah]

Yup thats the one, and as usual all the conspiricy theorists have jumped on it as being based on fact. Guys heres a clue" Its fiction!!!"