v's muFF* on de_dust2

Doorman · December 22, 2005, 07:58:31 PM

QuoteOriginally posted by MAD_ness@Dec 22 2005, 07:32 PM

waiting with baited breath !!

[post=106624]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

Another one with fishy breath. :whistle:

MAD_ness · December 22, 2005, 08:11:20 PM

hmmm

discussions with Diego ongoing ( but not looking good on our part )

JB · December 22, 2005, 08:14:42 PM

Explain to him our unblemished record and the fact we were decent enough to wait a LONG time for them to be ready and not complain at all, then point out their list of black flags, previous record and ask who he wants to reward.

Surely he's got enough sense to realise although there was only a 10 sec delay that also their were clearly no spectators watching anyway. No spectators no problem? <_<

MAD_ness · December 22, 2005, 08:14:56 PM

right ...

Diego is stating that the rules say 90 secs MINIMUM delay on HLTV

so looks like we may have lost this arguement

still no answer yet though

Hippy · December 22, 2005, 08:22:40 PM

But theres no spectators so whats it matter?

MAD_ness · December 22, 2005, 08:23:58 PM

because muFF lost ..

and they dont want a loss on their "impecable" record

:blink:

MAD_ness · December 22, 2005, 08:25:59 PM

From Ãiego, on Dec 22nd 2005 @ 20:25

Rules are rules, and you're on the wrong side of this one.

From Ãiego, on Dec 22nd 2005 @ 20:11

Min 90sec delay, spec or no

From Ãiego, on Dec 22nd 2005 @ 20:00

You should check that again..

From Ãiego, on Dec 22nd 2005 @ 19:39

10sec delay on HLTV

Hippy · December 22, 2005, 08:30:23 PM

So what happens now?

The match is void?

MAD_ness · December 22, 2005, 08:32:17 PM

still waiting his answer

Doris · December 22, 2005, 08:41:54 PM

where was their gay hltv?

they supposed to get their own?

stiuck it up their TANGO.. rematch if they void it.. then cane ass yet again.. t0$$pots :ranting: :ranting:

MAD_ness · December 22, 2005, 10:37:09 PM

what *has* amazed me on this one is how quick the ed admins have jumped on it ...but the one which JB sent to the admins with regards to the cheat from a month or so ago didn't even warrant a reply from any of the admins ...

disappointed is not the word .....

:ranting:

DuVeL · December 22, 2005, 11:43:51 PM

QuoteOriginally posted by MAD_ness@Dec 23 2005, 12:37 AM
what *has* amazed me on this one is how quick the ed admins have jumped on it ...but the one which JB sent to the admins with regards to the cheat from a month or so ago didn't even warrant a reply from any of the admins ...
disappointed is not the word .....

:ranting:
[post=106658]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

State this to them aswell and make sure you add the dMw-reputation to it aswell.
I am proud to be one of the Charlymembers of dMw and really like the rep in there that we have and I don't want to have it spoiled because of something like this.
You also might want tyo add that we don't use TeamSpeak or what so ever so that the delay and all wouldn't be of any help to use in any way.

BTW, Was there allready any outcome on that cheating gimp? If so: I've missed it.

Anonymous · December 23, 2005, 12:33:23 AM

Message sent to Waylander tonight requesting that he investigate both issues. I will await his response.

Red_Thunder · December 23, 2005, 02:04:28 AM

Im used to dealing with issue @ ED.

They should have checked this before the match started, i bet if they had won they wouldnt of made an issue out of this.

The ED admins need to really stand back and take a look, like some of you have mentioned would anybody from dMw really go " woo yeah m8 th1s is ownag3 h4x cam @ hltv ye w1ck3d ch34t5" lets really try cheating against a clan with only 3 players.
Admins need a slap, and also need to get removing this damn right a%$e h$%es

Its really pathetic and tbh the CS community is slowly hitting a rock bottom of sportsman/ gamesman ship. Sadly theres becoming less and less space for friendly mature clans, unless u "own" and oh yeah "ED is nub ROFLcakes" < yes people do say that.

Someone please protect me

:ranting: right im going to bed.

More thoughts?

MAD_ness · December 23, 2005, 09:16:24 AM

If this goes the way of a default result to muFF I will have to seriously reconsider the point of arranging matches in ed ..

muFF have had 2 black flags from the last 3 games and 7 in total from the last month, so their reputation is pretty high then innit ??

as Red so rightly pointed out ....IF they had won (and lets face it ..the way the arrogant ar$es were they EXPECTED to!!) then the result would have been entered ..end of story....surely the ed admins can see that this is a less than reputable clan who will continue to bend and shape the rules whenever it suits them ...

and this post is written with FULL christmas cheer .....ya shoulda seen my original thoughts on this ......

ps. no smilies ...........'cos I aint smiley ATM