Ladder format/rules

Squonk · September 24, 2007, 03:17:02 PM

Quote from: Penfold;207181You all happy to be available to oversee matches?
PEN

Yup

Quotepresume that if it's a draw the team positions remain unchanged?

I think as its coded at the moment a draw is classed as a chanallgers win..
but aim not 100% i just seem to remember seeing it somwhere

Whitey · September 24, 2007, 03:26:17 PM

Quote from: squonk;207182Yup

I think as its coded at the moment a draw is classed as a chanallgers win..
but aim not 100% i just seem to remember seeing it somwhere

If it's a draw the positions in the ladder will be swapped :narnar:

Penfold · September 24, 2007, 03:27:38 PM

okey dokey.

FTW then :norty:

PEN

Whitey · October 04, 2007, 12:57:43 PM

As we have more teams in the ladder than we originally thought, how about making it so that you can challenge up to three places above you?

I'm just a bit concerned that we may have teams who want to play more than once per fortnight and are restricted in who they can challenge, to the point that they can't arrange another match.

Another item we need to discuss is weapon restrictions. Do we have a standard of 1 AWP/Auto per team, no AWPs/Autos at all or just let the challenging team specify any restrictions?

I do like the option of being able to specify 1 AWP per team as it would give us some practice against them. It was our main weakness during our last period in ED.

Anonymous · October 04, 2007, 01:12:10 PM

1 AWP per team gets my vote.

Dr Sadako · October 04, 2007, 01:25:05 PM

Quote from: Whitey;208693As we have more teams in the ladder than we originally thought, how about making it so that you can challenge up to three places above you?

I'm just a bit concerned that we may have teams who want to play more than once per fortnight and are restricted in who they can challenge, to the point that they can't arrange another match.

Another item we need to discuss is weapon restrictions. Do we have a standard of 1 AWP/Auto per team, no AWPs/Autos at all or just let the challenging team specify any restrictions?

I do like the option of being able to specify 1 AWP per team as it would give us some practice against them. It was our main weakness during our last period in ED.

I think challenging at most 3 places above you is not a problem. This doesn't mean that you aren't allowed to challenge teams below you! The only risk is that you might lose. You will not gain any positions if you win.

Regarding AWPs/Autos, 1 per team sounds reasonable.
However, we could slightly change it so that the team with lower position are the only ones allowed to use it. Or that the ladder leader isn't allowed to use it. What do you think?

Anonymous · October 04, 2007, 01:27:00 PM

Quote from: Dr Sadako;208700However, we could slightly change it so that the team with lower position are the only ones allowed to use it. Or that the ladder leader isn't allowed to use it. What do you think?

I think it will be harder to enforce and we'll end up with those "I forgot I wasn't allowed it moments". I like the idea but just hard to enforce. 1 per team is easily sorted through SourceMod

Squonk · October 04, 2007, 04:05:22 PM

1 per team sounds good to me