Second BF2 dMw server for Special Forces?

Ranger · November 24, 2005, 02:34:55 PM

(Sorry, but I have to ask)...

Just wondering how the Admins see SPecial Forces working with our normal BF2 play on the dMw server?

I notice that Tactical Gamer have gone for a completely seperate Special Forces server, maintaining it's excellent 64 player BF2 server.

Is this an option for us? Do we have the resouces?

Anonymous · November 24, 2005, 02:40:34 PM

The server should be more than capable.

However, do we have enough people? Would the community prefer a BF2 server and a BF2:SF server or just a BF2 server or just a BF2:SF server or should we have it day or week about.

Over to you: Discuss!

delanvital · November 24, 2005, 02:42:47 PM

Let us wait and see. We might end up playing SF only, who knows!

Ranger · November 24, 2005, 03:14:24 PM

Yes - I agree ~ 'Let us wait and see'...

But on the 'Is there enough of us' issue ~ I know this might seem extravagent, but it would be nice for us to say 'tonight's a SF night' (or maybe we have a special 'SF' night on a particular day of the week...

I don't know...What do you think?

sulky_uk · November 24, 2005, 03:18:19 PM

im getting it at the end of the month, another quick question

r the weapons all unlocked in sf? as ive seen thru personal experiance that those sneeky beeky ppl can pick and choose just about any weapon they want

CoolHand · December 02, 2005, 01:54:49 PM

QuoteOriginally posted by Ranger@Nov 24 2005, 05:14 PM
Yes - I agree ~ 'Let us wait and see'...

But on the 'Is there enough of us' issue ~ I know this might seem extravagent, but it would be nice for us to say 'tonight's a SF night' (or maybe we have a special 'SF' night on a particular day of the week...

I don't know...What do you think?
[post=102660]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

Sorry for doubleposting... I saw this thread just after I made a new post about this topic....

I'd say that Ranger had a point: We could start off with one or two nights reserved for SF. One night a week would maybe be enough, at least until more (all?) have the SF installed.

What does the admins mean?

Armitage · December 02, 2005, 02:35:46 PM

I would say see how it goes. But what we don't want to see is 2 server with a couple of people on (i.e. the way CS split). We could always rotate the server?

Anonymous · December 02, 2005, 02:44:28 PM

QuoteOriginally posted by Armitage@Dec 2 2005, 02:35 PM
I would say see how it goes. But what we don't want to see is 2 server with a couple of people on (i.e. the way CS split). We could always rotate the server?
[post=103706]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

:withstupid:

Ranger · December 02, 2005, 02:45:21 PM

QuoteOriginally posted by Armitage@Dec 2 2005, 02:35 PM
I would say see how it goes. But what we don't want to see is 2 server with a couple of people on (i.e. the way CS split). We could always rotate the server?
[post=103706]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

I agree (after thinking about it) - be nice to have all the gang around...

So rotation gets my vote ~ but how much of a pain in the ass would that be for the Admins to set up???

Anonymous · December 02, 2005, 02:46:13 PM

QuoteOriginally posted by Ranger@Dec 2 2005, 02:45 PM
So rotation gets my vote ~ but how much of a pain in the ass would that be for the Admins to set up???
[post=103709]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

Probably not too bad but you would be at the mercy of one of us being avail to change the servers round.

Armitage · December 02, 2005, 03:44:53 PM

I can do it most nights, unless i have to go away for work.