Delanvital's Ping

[delanvital]

Thanks for helping me out guys with all these pings. I needed a little "persuation" to nudge my ISP in the right direction. Seems like pings to UK have been fixed, this is my new trace route, but they are actually going to see if they can improve some more!

Tracing route to blue.atb-sales.co.uk [87.240.138.19]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.100.1
  2     7 ms     7 ms     8 ms  lo1.sgnxx3.ip.tele.dk [80.166.138.221]
  3    17 ms    47 ms    53 ms  ge-0-3-0-40.1000M.sgnxj1.ip.tele.dk [83.88.2.129]
  4    10 ms    11 ms    11 ms  pos5-2.622M.naenxg1.ip.tele.dk [83.88.27.154]
  5    11 ms    11 ms    11 ms  pos2-0.622M.albnxg1.ip.tele.dk [83.88.23.217]
  6    42 ms    24 ms    26 ms  so-0-1-0.2488M.albnxu1.ip.tele.dk [83.88.20.209]

  7    12 ms    11 ms    12 ms  pos3-0.2488M.virnxg1.ip.tele.dk [83.88.23.206]
  8    10 ms    10 ms    11 ms  so-1-0-0.622M.virnxj2.ip.tele.dk [83.88.0.78]
  9    10 ms    10 ms    11 ms  ge-4-3-0-2.cph10.ip.tiscali.net [192.38.7.61]
 10    47 ms    47 ms    48 ms  so-2-0-2.lon22.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.81.69]
 11    48 ms    49 ms    48 ms  euroconnex-gw.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.78.178]
 12    45 ms    41 ms    42 ms  cr1-fe40.the.uk.euroconnex.net [217.112.80.78]
 13    42 ms    42 ms    42 ms  host-87-240-128-50.hi-velocity.net [87.240.128.50]
 14    43 ms    43 ms    44 ms  blue.atb-sales.co.uk [87.240.138.19]

Trace complete.

Haven't checked where the individual stops are but 42-48 ms is good enough for me... I wonder if they can do better

[Anonymous]

You have a few hops in Denmark before jumping across to London and then to HiV. I don't think htey could reduce the nnumber of hops without a lot of restructuring peering. TBH 40 - 50ms is pretty good . A stable ping of 40 to 50 is better than erratic ping od 30 to 100

[delanvital]

Originally posted by BlueBall@Apr 5 2006, 10:02 AM
You have a few hops in Denmark before jumping across to London and then to HiV. I don't think htey could reduce the nnumber of hops without a lot of restructuring peering. TBH 40 - 50ms is pretty good . A stable ping of 40 to 50 is better than erratic ping od 30 to 100

[post=120993]Quoted post[/post]

[/b]

Yeah I know and that is why I did not bother looking up the countries etc. But when they want to do better I wont stop 'em