Tank Requirements

Started by TeaLeaf, May 16, 2006, 12:49:25 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Padding

Indeed, but i wasnt really up to finding out how at the time.


BTW, to get back on the TOPIC, i want all people to talk about their classes and what they think a particular specc will do for our raids


Gorion

QuoteOriginally posted by opticalrush@May 17 2006, 10:59 AM
I do not agree on this statement we got 2 defensive specced tanks 3 + rexon
and they others with wrath we had 1 good try with a pug
[post=127338]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

ok about your point,

1) i rarely see rexon online
2) we have the rexon "comminication problem"
3) we still need 4 prot tanks
4) and what if a prot tank looses his connection/lags/his pc explodes.. (which can easily happen)

answer: we need more prot tanks, you already had a taste of how hard it is with only 2 real tanks when raggy was getting drunk with spiritus.. (remember firemaw..)

and yes an officer CAN force you to respec...like it or not

end of discussion..
Guild Wars 2 - Characters: Dragelis / Estril / Viliona
Battle.net - LydonB#2167
Warframe - LydonB

Sinap

QuoteOriginally posted by Gorion@May 17 2006, 06:17 PM
and yes an officer CAN force you to respec...like it or not
[post=127467]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

Not true. An officer can decide not to invite you to the raid, but can't really force you to respec :P Could be breaking the law if they some how did :P
Sinap - 85 Human Warrior
Yarena - 85 Night Elf Priest
Xiaa - 83 Human Mage

Padding

Yes we could actually force if we wanted to by setting the rules strict for RG1, but it may not be very positive


Dajo

Okay, since nobody is stepping up, I, Dajo am willing to respec to protection warrior under the following conditions:

1) I'm still allowed to spend my DKP on DMG items, and not tank items.
2) I'll respec immediatly when we do an instance which is above MC lvl more then two times a week. So for example 3x BWL. So we can have more tries on Nefarian / Skeram / whatever Nax 1st boss is.
3) I wanna be allowed to respec damage once in a while for a week, being payed by myself offcourse.

If this doesnt sound to much for the officers, I be more then happy to respec to a protection warrior. (5/11/35)

Padding

This topic is to discuss the posibilites and effects people think it haves when we have people who want to be both PVP and PVE specced at the same time, so please try to keep an abstract view when commenting back

Its not meant to hit any people particular


JanuZ

just one question warriors don't need to be full protection spec to be able to tank fairly well, many of the top end tanks only have what 15points in protection? I think the main part is to get more with some protection and get people from speccing pure fury/arms

"Fairy tales do not tell children the dragons exist. Children already know that dragons exist. Fairy tales tell children the dragons can be killed." G. K. Chesterton

Gorion

QuoteOriginally posted by Drazila@May 17 2006, 07:58 PM
just one question warriors don't need to be full protection spec to be able to tank fairly well, many of the top end tanks only have what 15points in protection? I think the main part is to get more with some protection and get people from speccing pure fury/arms
[post=127483]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]


well i tried out every spec.. but since i went 5/11/35 i found it much much better to tank, its better to hold aggro (ash may be a pain the the butt sometimes), rest of the prot tree is really nice to have, some abilities do massive aggro in a short anmount of time ( shield slam, instant cast, very nice to have! ) and the +5% extra dam on 1handers helps with aggro and is also good for killing stuff with dual wield

bdw

Dajo thanks for the courage there :) going prot is a hard choice only a few are willing to make :) and as i said before when you trialed prot.. youre a good tank :P
Guild Wars 2 - Characters: Dragelis / Estril / Viliona
Battle.net - LydonB#2167
Warframe - LydonB

Sebas

To move the warrior discussion to the priests.
Would a Shadow Priest be an improvement to our raid? We have none at the moment and with Shadow Weaving which Warlocks would really like. (evenmore damage Asheera, /pat tanks  :narnar: ) And a Shadow Priest is good enough for keeping a group as 7 or 8 alive with Vampiric Embrace and healing outside of Shadowform. Mind you mages, Shadow Priests  can beat you of your place in the damage list :P
Only downside is that they aren't really a lasting power but shouldn't get aggro anymore than mages, if played well. And they use atleast 4 spaces of dots, SW:P, Vamp Embrace, Shadow Weaving and Mind Flay, and thats quite a lot on a limit of 16.

So, yes or no to Shadow Priests?

Gorion

from a tanks point of view.. HOLY

we have the rest of the DPS classes to do the damage part
Guild Wars 2 - Characters: Dragelis / Estril / Viliona
Battle.net - LydonB#2167
Warframe - LydonB

Snowstormer

QuoteOriginally posted by Sebas@May 17 2006, 10:31 PM
Mind you mages, Shadow Priests  can beat you of your place in the damage list :P
[post=127490]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

In fights that last under 2min. You have nowhere enough mana nor manacost to do what damage we can, In any fight that lasts long..like bosses. And where's the burst-part + AoE? :P
Apologies for harsh language in my posts, just saying what i think. Snowstormer, 60 mage.

I love bloodlord mandorkir.

Neff

QuoteMind you mages, Shadow Priests can beat you of your place in the damage list
Well, they're used to it , us warlocks are there anyways :D

Holy holy and Holy all the way, benefits the raid WAY more :)
[quote=Adularena] Robin?!?!?! *shouts* "Lets ride, my nimble youngster!" - Mmmm, how batman loves Robin to hum the Batman theme (na nananan anan ananana BatMAN!!) while *cough* Exploring Batman`s secret grotto.[/quote]

TEH N00m IS BACK WITH TEH PWN!:yell:

lunares

QuoteOriginally posted by Gorion@May 17 2006, 08:35 PM
from a tanks point of view.. HOLY

we have the rest of the DPS classes to do the damage part
[post=127492]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

If you would look at priests in a raid and how they could have their talents, i would say 1 shadow for the reasons sebas said (if they rest knows how to not get agro), 2 specced in discipline at least until the 10% more mana(and ofc 1 of them specced to kill kreuz with power infusion :devil: ) And 3 holy priests for the healing. That way you have a few who can last longer mana wise and a gew who heal a bit better. And ofc the shadow priest for those specific abilities. I had 6 priests here cause thats the normal attendance we have.

Lunares
When you feel yourself sinking into madness..... Dive!

Keltor

I used to be full prot and it was great until they corrected shield block (no more soloing ST grrrr). Putting 15 points in prot talent should be enough for a lil bit more lasting power but some warriors are useful being fully arms/fury. Arms for MS and reducing boss healing and fury with improved battle shout boosts a rogue's dps.

Padding

QuoteIf you would look at priests in a raid and how they could have their talents, i would say 1 shadow for the reasons sebas said (if they rest knows how to not get agro), 2 specced in discipline at least until the 10% more mana(and ofc 1 of them specced to kill kreuz with power infusion devil2.gif ) And 3 holy priests for the healing. That way you have a few who can last longer mana wise and a gew who heal a bit better. And ofc the shadow priest for those specific abilities. I had 6 priests here cause thats the normal attendance we have.

Maybe if it was the same players in all the raids Luna, but its certainly not. Thats why i think we need a general rule that players should stick to a certain specc for  that will benefit the PVE enviroment more than the PVP environment. There is a reasons that the hardcore raiding guild are enforcing players to stick to certain speccs, and thats ofcourse that the speccs are benefitting their raids the most