Officers and CENSORS

[TeaLeaf]

This is the age old argument which if you do some searching on the forum's fabulously quick new search facility then you'll find previous rants.

Freedom brings with it responsibilities.  You cannot talk about one without the other as one man's freedom impinges upon another man's freedom.

So please, when talking about the freedom remember to balance it with the responsibilities as they go hand in hand.  Without the counterbalance you have to support terrorism, bombers, murderers, rapists etc.  It's the logical conclusion of one without the other.

Without some some of social norm or standard, anarchy reigns.  

TL.

[Bob]

censorement is a must, in the past i can remember a guild member left the guild cuz there where a lot of crap in the guild chat and his son was reading it often.

That is a matter that really can't be compared to this one.  That specific case was due to excessive use of bad language, and censoring of that kind of specific content can be accepted (but you don't need to censor it all, only those "bad language" words... and this is bdw done automatically by the forum mostly now...).

What the case is here is much different.  Here it's about censoring somebodys oppinoin about a case.  Saying that you tink something/somebody sucks can hardly bee looked upon as bad language (perhaps not the most diplomatic way to express oneself, but none the less), and shouldn't really need any censoring at all.

[saori]

Well, i dont have anything else to say about this topic. I had started a new thread in the general discussion zone.

[Asheera]

That is a matter that really can't be compared to this one. That specific case was due to excessive use of bad language, and censoring of that kind of specific content can be accepted (but you don't need to censor it all, only those "bad language" words... and this is bdw done automatically by the forum mostly now...).
 
What the case is here is much different. Here it's about censoring somebodys oppinoin about a case. Saying that you tink something/somebody sucks can hardly bee looked upon as bad language (perhaps not the most diplomatic way to express oneself, but none the less), and shouldn't really need any censoring at all.

ofc Bob i meant a censor was a must in the cas i mentioned.
 
if some1 censor your opinions the solution is just have a quite talk to him about that issue