Main Menu

Zyriax

Started by Tanales, September 04, 2006, 10:54:22 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Tanales

He is interessted in a guardian Spot but can only attend 2/3 raidnights, hes wife wont let him play more than that.

Whats your thoughs? we need some mages and he could help us out.
EVE-Online: Lurek Andilles and Cerok
WoW: Tanales, lvl 90 Hunter on Aszune
BattleTag: Lurek#1103


     

Padding

One of my best friends, really nice guy. Put him on trial and see if he makes attendance. Nice to have a mage that just fills the spots from time to time, since our general mages have extraordinary attendance


TeaLeaf

I'd rather find one with good attendance rather than someone we will have to find 'another half' for when they're not there.  No offence to friends, but I would like steady high attendance mages, 2/3 nights.

TL.
TL.
Wisdom doesn\'t necessarily come with age. Sometimes age just shows up all by itself.  (Tom Wilson)
Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships. (Michael Jordan)

Padding

2/3 is what he can attend so he meets what we want


TeaLeaf

We're 5/6 now Padding, 2/3 is RG2.

TL.
TL.
Wisdom doesn\'t necessarily come with age. Sometimes age just shows up all by itself.  (Tom Wilson)
Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships. (Michael Jordan)

Padding

True tho.... well he might perform better with time and its not like we have others in the queue
 
Trial & play is what i say (notice the rhyme) :flirty:


Bastet

if he can make 2/3 garanteed, i wont have a problem getting him in. however if its lower, then no go.
Aszune (Alliance):
Sokhar lv 80 (H/M) Warrior, Sokhár lv 80 (H/M) Death Knight, Beset lv 70 (NE/F) Druid, Bastet lv 70 (NE/F) Rogue, Mentu lv 70 (Dr/M) Shaman
-=[dMw]=-Bastet (CSS) / -=[dMw]=-Niwa (BF2) / -=dMw=- Sokhar (BF2142)
-=[dMw]=- MVP Award Holder (June 2006) Winning team -=[dMw]=- Christmas Crunch (2008)

Padding

Try and demote if necessary


Padding



TeaLeaf

We should not take someone into RG1 that states to us up front that they will fail the attendance requirement.  We would not accept someone into RG1 who said that, we should therefore not accept this application - an application which we have yet to receive.  If we take part-timers for RG1 we just build a problem into the system for ourselves and that would be intensely stupid of us to do.

RG2 sounds just right for him though.

TL.
TL.
Wisdom doesn\'t necessarily come with age. Sometimes age just shows up all by itself.  (Tom Wilson)
Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships. (Michael Jordan)

Padding

Well, mages need the attendance higher and i think there should also be 7 guardians as all other classes. Just because we have 2 officers as mages, doesnt mean that mages shouldnt have less competition for the spots
 
Lets say you get Xiaa as the 6th member, Zyriax could be the 7th and even creating a bit less competition for you, as he is not attending all raids
 
Lets get the conclusion done on this, im tired of discussion these things and no decisions are made


TeaLeaf

My decision then:

No.  We do not need another part-time raider.

We get Sinap in on his mage as agreed in the other thread as we know his attendance should be good.  With the other Mages retaining pretty much 100% attendance there is no reason to create a problem where none currently exists.  We only have 7 in other classes where attendance is patchy at best.

TL.
TL.
Wisdom doesn\'t necessarily come with age. Sometimes age just shows up all by itself.  (Tom Wilson)
Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships. (Michael Jordan)