8800gts 320 ro 640

Started by 0ni0n, October 26, 2007, 01:43:25 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

0ni0n

i'm considering a 8800gts is it worth the extra £60 for the extra 320 mb of ram?
 
i'm thinking that maybe by the time you will see a benefit the card will be really for the scrap bin anyway.
 
cheers mick
\'A man of many layers\'

T-Bag

I went for the 320mb version, I thought exactly the same. By the time games need 640mb that £60 will be a decent wedge of cash towards the replacement. I guess the biggest decider is the resolution though...I run at 1280x1024, if you run higher (especially 1680x1050 or higher) then the extra ram may serve more of a purpose.
Juggling Hard Disks over concrete floors ends in tears 5% of the time.

Carr0t

#2
I'd agree with that T-Bag said to be honest. I specifically didn't get a TFT monitor any larger than 19" because I wanted to be able to run everything in native res (1280x1024) and didn't want to have to upgrade really frequently because native res was something astronomical (as it would be on a larger monitor). For me, by the time 640MB gfx RAM becomes useful at 1280x1024, i'll be looking to get a next-gen (as in not out yet) card *anyway*, but you may find it makes a difference if you're using a 22" widescreen TFT or whatever.
[imga=right]http://77.108.129.49/fahtags/ms10.jpg[/imga]Wash: This is going to get pretty interesting.
Mal: Define interesting...
Wash: Oh god, oh god, we\'re all going to die?

0ni0n

cheers guys, i will be running  1680 x 1050 so might posssibly worth the extra.
\'A man of many layers\'



Lee

The 8800 GT is coming out on Monday i believe and i hear that it performs better and is cheaper than the GTS. Here's one such link. Click.
[imglink]http://77.108.129.49/fahtags/ms2.jpg[/imglink]  

Do some Folding today! Click the above link. :)

Gorion

Quote from: 0ni0n;211412cheers guys, i will be running 1680 x 1050 so might posssibly worth the extra.

 
running that on a 22" wide, get the extra ram, youlle be needing it
Guild Wars 2 - Characters: Dragelis / Estril / Viliona
Battle.net - LydonB#2167
Warframe - LydonB

0ni0n

Quote from: Lee;211425The 8800 GT is coming out on Monday i believe and i hear that it performs better and is cheaper than the GTS. Here's one such link. Click.

You were right and they look pretty good for the price  http://www.overclockers.co.uk/productlist.php?groupid=701&catid=56&subid=1008
\'A man of many layers\'

T-Bag

#9
I assume judging by prices that the GT is slower than the GTS even though the clock speed is higher? I assume this has to do with the difference between a 256bit and 320bit interface...what does this mean to performance? (is it worth saving that little money?)

Edit: Ok the reviews place it between the GTS and the GTX so it's worth going for. I never really bought Nvidia untill recently so their naming system confuses me, the 8600GT is slower than the 8600GTS, but this GT is faster?!.
Only down side seems to be it's single slot (small fan used, so can be noisy), but I doubt it'll be too bad.
Juggling Hard Disks over concrete floors ends in tears 5% of the time.

lionheart

***!?” That ladies and gentleman is a word-for-word quote of what crossed our minds after the first hour of testing the 8800 GT in F.E.A.R., Half-Life 2 Episode Two and the Unreal Tournament 3 demo. We summarily spent the next 90 minutes re-running a collection of GeForce 8800 GT benchmarks back-to-back with the GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB. We simply couldn’t believe the performance results we were seeing and thought we’d setup something on the testbed wrong or handicapped the GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB in some strange way. After over an hour of wasted time, it was pretty apparent that the 8800 GT performance results we’d originally obtained were legitimate and the card truly was faster than the GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB, despite its narrower memory interface and smaller 512MB frame buffer.

http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/nvidia_geforce_8800_gt_performance/default.asp
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Lee

Quote from: T-Bag;211619I assume judging by prices that the GT is slower than the GTS even though the clock speed is higher? I assume this has to do with the difference between a 256bit and 320bit interface...what does this mean to performance? (is it worth saving that little money?)

Edit: Ok the reviews place it between the GTS and the GTX so it's worth going for. I never really bought Nvidia untill recently so their naming system confuses me, the 8600GT is slower than the 8600GTS, but this GT is faster?!.
Only down side seems to be it's single slot (small fan used, so can be noisy), but I doubt it'll be too bad.

They'll most likely be upgrading the current GTS and GTX graphics card so that the GT will yet again be below the GTS.
[imglink]http://77.108.129.49/fahtags/ms2.jpg[/imglink]  

Do some Folding today! Click the above link. :)

Gh0st Face Killah

If you haven't bought one yet don't. Get the 8800gt thats just come out its cheaper and runs faster then the 8800gts. See this article.

http://www.custompc.co.uk/news/601500/asus-geforce-8800-gt--first-look.html
-=[dMw]=-Gh0st Face Killah
Ex Ingorantia Ad Spientiam, E Luce Ad Tenebras

Gh0stys mixes

D. A. M. N.
Naked Mothers Against Dyslexia

Gh0st Face Killah

Oops just read lionhearts post!!

And no Lee they won't be upgrading the hardware on the gts and gtx cards according to that article they are being phased out to make way for newer ones using the same gpu architecture as the gt.
-=[dMw]=-Gh0st Face Killah
Ex Ingorantia Ad Spientiam, E Luce Ad Tenebras

Gh0stys mixes

D. A. M. N.
Naked Mothers Against Dyslexia