Check this about 9/11

[DuVeL]

LINK
It'll only take an hour.

[GhostMjr]

Saw that a few weeks ago, pretty surreal if it is true.  

[A Twig]

Yeah, not so sure about his towers stuff, there are too many ifs and variables, but the pentagon one is definitely a bit odd.

[sulky_uk]

hmm look at these


pentagon

in plane site

ghost gun

[Toxteth]

I've watched the first 10 mins and it seems to be very interesting, just don't have enough time for the rest  

[Thulsa Doom]

Watched 20mins and think it's typical American paranoia to look into conspiracy theories.

It still filled me with contempt and disgust at the perpetrators of the attack.

No doubt put together by the same folks that think Princess Diana was murdered, that there's a guy works down the chipshop swears he's Elvis, that a Number 10 Double-Decker bus can be seen on the moon.

[A Twig]

Yes and no. While a lot of the "errors" in the photographs related to the moon landings actually aren't errors, and in fact are perfectly acceptable within the laws of physics, there are some things which don't add up. While they may not have been orchestrated by the U.S. Gov, they could have been something more dramatic, indeed there could ahve been bombs planted in the building by terrorists, or perhaps they hijacked military aircraft, and the Government covered it up.

While I dont think that it wasnt a terrorist attack, I do think that the full nature of it was not revealed to us.

[Anonymous]

Bear in mind that you have a large metal object moving at speed through a frictional medium (air) generating a static charge. Chances are there was a potential difference between the building and the plane and what we observed was just a damn big spark.

Aircraft tyres are designed to conduct electricity believe it or not so that any residual charge on the aircraft dissipates on touchdown.

Who knows?