Should we....

[Anonymous]

...have a poll?

[Eternaluk]

Vote now and LIVE!

[DuVeL]

Voting again?
I vote no!

[Whitey]

I vote yes, I never get bored of clicking radio buttons!

[GhostMjr]

Voting again?
I vote no!

I miss the Austin Powers films. Yeah baby .

[Bob]

Me love polls :yahoo:

[Bk]

Yay, my first poll on the dMw forums, and such an important one to boot :yahoo:
Polls ftw :woot2:

[Doorman]

They're coming to take you away ahah, they're coming to take you away, hoho. Those nice young men in their clean white coats, they're coming to take you away haha, heehee :dribble:  hoho.:lmfao:
 
But don't worry BB, they'll give you lots of nice therapy to stop you getting BORED!


Oh yes, I voted yes. :thumbsup2:  I love a good poll.

[Thulsa Doom]

No, they're taking away all our jobs.

[Anonymous]

rofl @ TD :lmfao:

and the rest of you are as mad as me

[DuVeL]

2 poll or not 2 poll, that is the question...

[Dingo]

I vote we have a poll on whether we have a poll or not, and then poll the voters on whether the poll was significant enough to hold a further poll on the significance of the poll......................wohoo, I've just made another post.....should we now have a poll on whether I should post ever again?
 
To my mind, this definately requires a poll, but I know, let's have a poll to see if my opinion requires a poll, and dependant upon the outcome of the poll, another poll to see if the poll results were based upon my popularity or the clarity of my arguement, and then another poll to see if the voters within the poll were from the same ethnic background.
 
If not, another poll to see if ethnicity affects poll results and whether the introduction of members of different ethnic backgrounds can adversly affect poll results.
 
If so, we should really have a poll, to see if poll's that can be adversly affected by ethnicity are entirely valid, but we could of course take a poll to find that out.
 
 
Damn, if I had polled my constituents properly, I would have no need to take a poll, as the poll would have confirmed the previous poll results gained from the previous poll taken about the first poll.:devil:

[Anonymous]

I vote we have a poll on whether we have a poll or not, and then poll the voters on whether the poll was significant enough to hold a further poll on the significance of the poll......................wohoo, I've just made another post.....should we now have a poll on whether I should post ever again?
 
To my mind, this definately requires a poll, but I know, let's have a poll to see if my opinion requires a poll, and dependant upon the outcome of the poll, another poll to see if the poll results were based upon my popularity or the clarity of my arguement, and then another poll to see if the voters within the poll were from the same ethnic background.
 
If not, another poll to see if ethnicity affects poll results and whether the introduction of members of different ethnic backgrounds can adversly affect poll results.
 
If so, we should really have a poll, to see if poll's that can be adversly affected by ethnicity are entirely valid, but we could of course take a poll to find that out.
 
 
Damn, if I had polled my constituents properly, I would have no need to take a poll, as the poll would have confirmed the previous poll results gained from the previous poll taken about the first poll.:devil:

What frightens me is that your post makes more sense than my original post :blink:

[Luminance]

I like polls gib more plxxxx

[Bob]

2 poll or not 2 poll, that is the question...

Not quite Duvel...
3 polls or 4 polls, that's the question :norty: