Going Hard Core..

[Gone_Away]

New Line-up Coming up..

Panma Canal (Conquest)
Atacama Desert (Rush)
Port Valdez (Rush)
Valparaiso (Rush)
Oasis (Conquest)
Africa Harbor (Rush)
Isla Inocentes (Rush)
Laguna Alta (Conquest)
Harvest Day (Rush)
Cold War (Rush)
Africa Harbor (Conquest)

By Popular request.. WE'RE GOING HARDCORE!!!! :flirty::devil::flirty:

[TheDvEight]

Nice rotation choice cant wait for hardcore oasis easy kills , what is the max negative score you can get for team kills (can we set it on ther server for the person who teamkills "x" ammount of times gets kicked or will it be monitored by admins?) Can see it being a bit of a pain in the bum if we get idiots on who teamkill loads on purpose

[Naldo]

we're going hardcore!!!!

yayayay   :boxing:

[Gone_Away]

Nice rotation choice cant wait for hardcore oasis easy kills , what is the max negative score you can get for team kills (can we set it on ther server for the person who teamkills "x" ammount of times gets kicked or will it be monitored by admins?) Can see it being a bit of a pain in the bum if we get idiots on who teamkill loads on purpose

max tk set for 6.

[GhostMjr]

Sounds like a great idea.

After we try it can it be put to a vote if we decide to go permanent?

[TheDvEight]

6 seems a reasonable number to be fair possible sniper limit on rush maps aswell?

[TE_owner]

I hate hardcore :crying: and Port Valdez really really c'mon! :blink:

Having played a fair few of games of hardcore i found it to be not very much fun at all

[Gone_Away]

Sounds like a great idea.

After we try it can it be put to a vote if we decide to go permanent?

No Problem.. Essentially I'm just trying to squeeze a little more life out of BC2 before we move to BF3.

Its dMw's server, you guys tell me what you want and we'll go for it even if only a trial.

This change stems from a request from the BC2 regulars so keep them coming!!

[TheDvEight]

i wouldnt mind a sniper limit of 4 on rush maps ONLY please

[valdeko]

2 maps that can/might ruin/destroy the population on our server with Hardcore is Port Valdez and Isle Inocentes. 2 maps that on their own are more gank then objective fav. and with hardcore it might be even worse.
But then again, i might be wrong but just saying my opinion.

[Gone_Away]

i wouldnt mind a sniper limit of 4 on rush maps ONLY please

I'm not in favour of limiting weapons or enforcing weapon use rules such as no CG on infrantry. While a sniper nest is difficult to manage, it also presents some excellent stabbing opportunities.

What do the rest of you guys think??

[Fazer Erazer]

Stab a sniper and go home happy :boxing:...Although the idea of limiting snipers per side sounds good in reality if half of the opposing team are snipers then the chance of them destroying the MCOM's is very low and once Twobad starts lobbing C4 everywhere it will soon be BBQ sniper time.

[TheDvEight]

im not a fan of weapon/class limits either but when half the attacking team is sniper class it defeats the object of the rush game mode

[Tutonic]

I'm against class limits.

Its frustrating when you're attacking without the support of the cowardly snipers hiding at the back, but its not fair to limit weapons.

Example: I often play recon, but with a G3/shotgun instead of a sniper rifle. If you limit the number of recon players, you'll also be killing off legitimate play styles.

Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk

[TheDvEight]

I'm against class limits.

Its frustrating when you're attacking without the support of the cowardly snipers hiding at the back, but its not fair to limit weapons.

Example: I often play recon, but with a G3/shotgun instead of a sniper rifle. If you limit the number of recon players, you'll also be killing off legitimate play styles.

Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk

Thats a good point didnt think of that