Tonight DA TW'd a BOT on his team that was running

Anonymous · April 26, 2005, 09:36:27 PM

Tonight DA knifed a BOT on his team that was running in front of him (he wounded not killed). He then killed a BOT on his team just so he got to defuse the bomb.

Well he didn't get to defuse the bomb 'coz I can kick people faster than he can defuse bombs :devil:

I've had enough of him. No more. He has to go. I am not prepared to put up with his crap any more. I would sooner have GhostMjr in Charlie Company than this twat!

OldBloke · April 26, 2005, 09:56:03 PM

Get a grip.

Since when did we vote people out of their company without a full and proper debate.

Or am I having a humour failure here?

Anonymous · April 26, 2005, 09:58:10 PM

Debate? that's what the poll is for.

How many times does he have to make a mockery of everything we stand for before we will do something about him?

There are more complaints in this forum about him than any other player.

Oh and I have a "grip" thank you very much!

smite · April 26, 2005, 10:39:13 PM

Yes DA is a bit of an TANGO sometimes (arn't we all) but did he do it to an actual teamplayer? no... if he did then i would agree.
This is going a little far on the lets get DA parade. Try again.

Anonymous · April 27, 2005, 07:43:19 AM

There is no "lets get DA parade", if I am guilty of anything it is protecting the reputation of dMw. I love dMw and what it stands for. I am not going to stand idly by and see somebody set such an awful example on our public server especially when that person member of Charlie Company.

Whether it was a bot or another player makes no difference. He made a display on one of our servers that undermines what we stand for and sets a piss poor example to others. After all the warnings he has had he really should know by now that it is completely and utterly unacceptable.

I have spent many many hours over the last few weeks admining the servers through HLSW to try and maintain order and stop things going awry. I'm tired of doing it but it needs done. Why not try it for a while instead of accusing me of having a go at DA ??

TeaLeaf · April 27, 2005, 03:01:23 PM

Oldie has already acted on this and there is contingent action pending depending upon his response, so I would ask for some patience from all concerned.

Thank you.

TL.

smite · April 27, 2005, 04:51:38 PM

I didn't make my point clear last night obviously.

I was replying to the remark of DA must go rather than his actions and blood boiled. My appologies for shortness.

His actions needed a message telling him not to kill or attack anymore bots or be kicked and then a personal message telling him to stop being a tit (obviously put better) and that the admins are looking into his actions.

TeaLeaf · April 27, 2005, 06:17:53 PM

Thanks for the clarification Smite. What you suggested has already been done and we await DA's response.

TL.

Anonymous · April 29, 2005, 10:04:23 AM

I see that DA has been posting in the forums over the last couple of days but I have not seen a response to OBs PM to him.

Should the PM be sent to his email address? I know that I have missed PMs in the forums when the popup message didn't work.

TeaLeaf · April 29, 2005, 10:35:00 AM

Nope, I think that even DA should be able to spot the message. It is being monitored. OB, did you enable tracking for that message?

TL.

OldBloke · April 29, 2005, 01:04:44 PM

QuoteOriginally posted by TeaLeaf@Apr 29 2005, 10:35 AM
OB, did you enable tracking for that message?

TL.
[post=83068]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

Drat. No. :blush:

But the follow-up I just sent him has tracking enabled.

Anonymous · April 29, 2005, 08:53:56 PM

Is it just me or does this "apology" not seem very sincere.

TeaLeaf · April 29, 2005, 09:02:41 PM

We didn't ask him to be sincere, we asked him to apologise, which begrudgingly he has done. The purpose of the request was to fire a warning shot across his bows - which it has done. It has drawn a line in the sand and now we wait to see if it has any impact on his future behaviour. It's not written in a way I would like to see, but it was written and posted publically as requested.

I am now thinking whether or not we ought to move the confirmed bans onto the public side of the forum from Rogue's Gallery.

TL.

Anonymous · April 30, 2005, 10:23:47 AM

QuoteOriginally posted by TeaLeaf@Apr 29 2005, 08:02 PM
We didn't ask him to be sincere, we asked him to apologise, which begrudgingly he has done. The purpose of the request was to fire a warning shot across his bows - which it has done. It has drawn a line in the sand and now we wait to see if it has any impact on his future behaviour. It's not written in a way I would like to see, but it was written and posted publically as requested.
[post=83103]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

The apology thread seems to be taking on a level of brevity that I find disappointing. In short it looks as if this hasn't worked and everyone will think it a big joke

QuoteI am now thinking whether or not we ought to move the confirmed bans onto the public side of the forum from Rogue's Gallery.
[post=83103]Quoted post[/post]
[/b]

Mmmm, not sure about that. I don't have a problem with anything I have written in the forums - if I wasn't happy for the "culprit" to see it I wouldn't have written it. However, it could be a can of worms. DA seems to be enjoying his "bad boy reputation" and it may just add fuel to his fire? Dunno. undecided :blink:

Anonymous · April 30, 2005, 10:24:53 AM

Ooops, just realised that you said confirmed bans and not "all rogues gallery posts".

File me under "T" for "Numpty" :blush: