Announcement

[TeaLeaf]

Originally posted by Siffredi@Jun 26 2006, 10:20 AM
Nice one TL - but that also means that the ppl who have ambitions more than RG2 have to make up thier minds right now?

I'm not sure how you reached that conclusion.  It's not the one I reached.

TL.

[Bastet]

If you read it, you could still apply for RG1 if a spot frees up, but the officers are not forced to pick some1 from rg2 anymore, if a better application comes in from outside the guild we could pick that one too. As before with warlocks and mages some of these classes did not want to step up. Some of them wanted. It just leaves both the members and the officers with more choises afaik.

[Sazgul]

Mazii;

Note the ''

Nice too see someone noticed the '' in front and behind whining.    - not calling anyone a whiner, jujst trying to explain myself.

[Zabard]

Originally posted by Sazgul@Jun 26 2006, 12:15 PM
Mazii;
Nice too see someone noticed the '' in front and behind whining. - not calling anyone a whiner, jujst trying to explain myself.

[post=133566]Quoted post[/post]

[/b]

I'm sorry for being illiterate, but perhaps you would like to explain what 'whiner' means, if not whiner?

Jem

[Keltor]

I desire more raids. I play WoW everyday. I play for at least 8 hours everyday. We RG2 are raiding twice a week. It will soon be once a week if we can down Raggy in one day. So for the next 6 days what am I suppose to do? Hang around in IF? Doing countless naked Stockade runs? Adding another raid day would be nice and I was relieved to see Vargen's post as I was getting agitated with the unfair invite system when RG1 is short on people in BWL. Hope the new actions work..

[Mazii]

Originally posted by Keltor@Jun 26 2006, 12:55 PM
I desire more raids. I play WoW everyday. I play for at least 8 hours everyday. We RG2 are raiding twice a week. It will soon be once a week if we can down Raggy in one day. So for the next 6 days what am I suppose to do? Hang around in IF? Doing countless naked Stockade runs? Adding another raid day would be nice and I was relieved to see Vargen's post as I was getting agitated with the unfair invite system when RG1 is short on people in BWL. Hope the new actions work..

[post=133575]Quoted post[/post]

[/b]

When it comes to the point that we in RG2 can clear MC in 1 night, then we are at the start of entering BWL - meaning we will raid BWL the other raid night. The Marshals and Officers are currently discussing adding another raid day, but before we can do that we need to know how many that can make it - expect more news soon.

[Zabard]

Originally posted by Mazii@Jun 26 2006, 01:05 PM
When it comes to the point that we in RG2 can clear MC in 1 night, then we are at the start of entering BWL - meaning we will raid BWL the other raid night. The Marshals and Officers are currently discussing adding another raid day, but before we can do that we need to know how many that can make it - expect more news soon.

[post=133576]Quoted post[/post]

[/b]

Adding another raid day would, I'm sure, put both mine and other's minds at ease. I would be more than happy to stay with RG2 if this could be sorted.

Jem

[Menedil]

im just guessing, but once rg2 start bwl, they would possibly raid on sunday and tuesday alongside rg1, as i thought the reason they dont raid on these days is incase rg1 needs an rg2 member. if rg2 are doing bwl anyway, they wont be available for rg1, hence dont have to not raid on sunday and tuesday. or something.

[Bastet]

Yep, but this is currently up for discussion between the marshals and officers, so expect more news soon, however RG2 should focus first on getting ragnaros down on a weekly basis (and in 1 night) before they can start in BWL

[Zabard]

Originally posted by Menedil@Jun 26 2006, 01:36 PM
im just guessing, but once rg2 start bwl, they would possibly raid on sunday and tuesday alongside rg1, as i thought the reason they dont raid on these days is incase rg1 needs an rg2 member. if rg2 are doing bwl anyway, they wont be available for rg1, hence dont have to not raid on sunday and tuesday. or something.

[post=133584]Quoted post[/post]

[/b]

Just a thought, but if we have raids on different days, then RG1 and RG2 can help each other out if we have low attandance. Either if you did not have the chance to raid on your RG's day, or you have an alt to help out with. After all, having the help of a lower equipped alt is better than no help at all (in most cases).

Jem

[Nefrion]

I think it is important that RG2 is focusing on clearing MC in one night and not BWL.

[Nefertem]

Originally posted by Mazii+Jun 26 2006, 12:05 PM-->

QUOTE(Mazii @ Jun 26 2006, 12:05 PM)

When it comes to the point that we in RG2 can clear MC in 1 night, then we are at the start of entering BWL - meaning we will raid BWL the other raid night. The Marshals and Officers are currently discussing adding another raid day, but before we can do that we need to know how many that can make it - expect more news soon.

[post=133576]Quoted post[/post]

[/b]

[Zabard]

Originally posted by Nefertem@Jun 26 2006, 01:46 PM
Add another night now? Why would that help? If we aint starting in BWL now there is no point in adding it.. We can easyli take MC in two nights, almost even in a single night by now..

[post=133588]Quoted post[/post]

[/b]

The simple reason for this would be that we are very close to doing MC in one night, maybe not in four hours, but in one night none the less.

Of course we should get MC to farm status, but when we do it in one night, there is no reason to stop doing raids other nights. And it would be no point going back to an empty MC. Now when it comes to BWL, that's a whole new ball game. And if we're gonna try to learn the ropes by going there one night a week, we wouldn't get far.

We have to keep doing MC, as many need a lot of items there as well, just like RG1 is doing today. Tho I suspect they might soon drop MC to start looking at AQ40/Naxx?

[Bob]

Just want to add my two cents on the topic concerning recruiting folks to RG1: should it be RG2 members or outsiders?

When an RG1 member stops raiding completely so that there is a free spot, I think that spot should be open both to RG2 members (if they by some reason desire that: and if so, nobody should blame 'em in any way for doing so) and people outside of the guild, and also ofc. Soldier members (but the chance for them to have the required gear is quite slim, if it's not an old RG1 member that wants to start raiding again or so).

The other option is that a RG1 member doesn't want to raid as much as required by a Guardian membership anymore (or that raid days don't fit or whatever), and thus would like to step down to Defender status.  Than there is no need to bring "unnecessary" people into the guild.  And that will also benefit RG2 very much since they will get both a very good geared and also a very good experienced member.


And also a short last note: it seem to me that there are some folks that have expressed negative oppinions towards RG2 members that might want to advance to RG1 (this is bdw an attitude I don't think will help keeping folks in RG2...).  First of all people may have various reasons to want that, and that we all should respect, and second of all, if they for some reason don't feel comfortable (or whatever) in RG2 and can't join RG1, than they might as well leave for other guilds that can fit their needs.  And than you've lost the player anyhow - not only in that RG, but the whole guild.

[Devout]

Why we wanna hurry raiding in BWL...

Because it is Fun