Where to get the cheapest fix of cocaine?

[delanvital]

Interestingly, USA is further up than I thought.

http://www.economist.com/daily/chartgallery/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9414607

[BigFatCat]

Bloody typical, it's always more expensive in the UK than on the continent. Rip-Off Britain is still alive and well.

[Luminance]

woot we are 5th

oh wait thats bad

[Hektor]

700$ for 1 gramm- at least its too expensive for young people, so they cant afford it and take irreparable damage by "collecting experiences".
maybe one day also here in europe you can buy kokain for 10 euro. when you have children, how can you protect your own children from this?
im for a very hard punishment for kokaindealers. determent is the best prevention. and this crap is very dangerous espacially for young people.
just imagine, 2$ for 1g!

[Thulsa Doom]

700$ for 1 gramm- at least its too expensive for young people, ....

Think Crime !

[Gone_Away]

Guys,
 
I personally find this topic offensive. What value does this so called information bring to the community? Delan are you a crack-head or something?
 
I'm not interested in street value of class A drugs what so ever. Give your head a shake please.

[Hektor]

Think Crime !

for example in the usa, about every 5 seconds a man rape a woman or a girl.
what is the punishmment? WHEN they get caught by the policce, they go to prison a few years. after they come out, they continue.
here is a simple practical law: when those people get a very hard punishment for example death penalty, what do you think will happen?
-will the number of the raping of woman and girls increase? will it stay the same or will it go down?
- it will go down of course! its a simple practical law!
sad to say, but very often this kind of determent is necessary to retain peace.
here in germany taking kokain or dealing with it is a peccadillo
ffor the society as well as for the law( when you have little amounts of drugs, youll ge no punishment.
i just want to point out that a hard punishment is sometimes necessary to keep peace

do you knoe the movie "a time to kill" from john grisham with samuel l jackson?- remember what he did to the 2 men! in my opinion he did right!

[Hektor]

Guys,
 
I personally find this topic offensive. What value does this so called information bring to the community? Delan are you a crack-head or something?
 
I'm not interested in street value of class A drugs what so ever. Give your head a shake please.

your right, its a very serious topic, and maybe this isnt the right place to talk about theat kind of topics.
so ill quit before i start to philosophize

[delanvital]

I personally find this topic offensive. What value does this so called information bring to the community? Delan are you a crack-head or something? I'm not interested in street value of class A drugs what so ever. Give your head a shake please.

The list is posted for you to pick up what you want from the study. If you think the only value in posting the listing is learning where you go to get your drugs cheaper, then just ignore my post.

I, on the other hand, am amazed by the fact that the differences are that high and ponder on that for a while. I wonder why? High costs could be the reason some countries manage to control drugs better - and this could even be a scale for how well supply chain of cocaine is being fought in each country? With all the drugs in the US (prejudice on my part, maybe?) and the large scale production in South America I would expect them to be rock bottom on the list. Since they are not, this could be a measure of the strong enforcement? Does this relate to the cost in terms of length of prison sentences? Are there natural factors that prohibits the spread of drugs, such as distance from production sites - meaning that countries with water around them and far away from where the drugs are made, are the drugs more expensive there? I could go on and on and wonder...

But as I said, make of it what you want. But I sure as **** didn't post this as "traveller's guide to getting blow away cheap".

[delanvital]

your right, its a very serious topic, and maybe this isnt the right place to talk about theat kind of topics.

We are in the serious section which so far has covered way more serious topics.

so ill quit before i start to philosophize

I, for one, even if I am the only one, would like to hear where you thoughts lead you

[delanvital]

for example in the usa, about every 5 seconds a man rape a woman or a girl.
what is the punishmment?

I agree with you, in that sentences often does not reflect the damage they do. But is that because of lack of insight or will to make change, by people in position to change it? Should physical violations rate higher than economical crime for instance?

[Hektor]

oh i see, there is a serious section. i didnt notice that, but im quite new in this forum.

once i start talking about serious topics,  itll took hours until i stop:rolleyes: .
the problem is that i cant express properly in english, because i dont find the right words like i do in german.
because of that there is a high chance of  misconception - im afraid of that when its about important things.
(i think i gotta learn english better:D )

[Hektor]

I agree with you, in that sentences often does not reflect the damage they do. But is that because of lack of insight or will to make change, by people in position to change it? Should physical violations rate higher than economical crime for instance?

when you decide about a punishment you can think about yourself. i mean, think for example when someone rape your daughter or when someone steal all your money, what would you do to the culprit?
i met a lot of people who are against the death penalty. they all say its babaric,cruel and inhuman- so far, so good.
but when i tell them:  imagine someone rape your own sister or daughter,
and this man stand infront of you, and you can decide what punishment this man should get. you know what they answer?- they all say, in that case they want the death penalty for this man.
you see, there is obviously a discrepancy. but sometimes its necessary to use violence when you want to keep peace for innocent people.
what i want to say is that everyone has a feeling for what is right and what is wrong. no matter in what culture or society someone lives.
here is another example:
imagine you have a cat. you are eating and you give your cat a piece of the fisch you are eating. the cat sits near you and eat it.
but, when you are eating, and turn your back to your plate,
and your cat steal a piece of the fisch, it wont sits near to you while eating. the cat will run away and eat the fisch somewhere else.
so, even the cat knows that its not ok to steal, otherwise the cat wont hide from you, while before it stay near to youand eat.
every human has a feeling for justice and knows right and wrong. you see even the animal know!
because of that(the knowledge of all people), high punishment for physikal as well as for econimical crime is justified.
its very simple: when you are charitable to criminals, then you arent fair to the righteous.

[Hektor]

maybe a bit off topic,you know i tend to digress :byebye:

[delanvital]

when you decide about a punishment you can think about yourself. i mean, think for example when someone rape your daughter or when someone steal all your money, what would you do to the culprit?
i met a lot of people who are against the death penalty. they all say its babaric,cruel and inhuman- so far, so good.
but when i tell them:  imagine someone rape your own sister or daughter,
and this man stand infront of you, and you can decide what punishment this man should get. you know what they answer?- they all say, in that case they want the death penalty for this man.
you see, there is obviously a discrepancy. but sometimes its necessary to use violence when you want to keep peace for innocent people.
what i want to say is that everyone has a feeling for what is right and what is wrong. no matter in what culture or society someone lives.
here is another example:
imagine you have a cat. you are eating and you give your cat a piece of the fisch you are eating. the cat sits near you and eat it.
but, when you are eating, and turn your back to your plate,
and your cat steal a piece of the fisch, it wont sits near to you while eating. the cat will run away and eat the fisch somewhere else.
so, even the cat knows that its not ok to steal, otherwise the cat wont hide from you, while before it stay near to youand eat.
every human has a feeling for justice and knows right and wrong. you see even the animal know!
because of that(the knowledge of all people), high punishment for physikal as well as for econimical crime is justified.
its very simple: when you are charitable to criminals, then you arent fair to the righteous.

I have never been in the strong emotinal situation you mentioned, so I can't say. But I so far favour no death penalty. In my eyes, taking a life would always be a crime, regardless of who it belongs to. I know there are tons of people that disagree here. So, a criminal who has killed some one dear to me stands in front of me. I would probably want to kill him, or at least bring my hatred upon him. Well, then the law should be there, saying I can't kill him. Just because I want to strike him down for crimes committed to me, it doesn't make my desired actions fair. What does vengeance bring me? Not much I believe. I guess it comes down to what vengeance does for you?