FIA Decision

[Slider 46]

rofl, and he isn't grabbing more a grope

If he wasnt sat on that wall, he wouldnt reach.
I hate the little betty swollock. Cant one of the counter strike snipers nip over and slot him? Actually, don't worry, it won't be long before he dissapears up his own a*se anyway.
Remember the Michelin fiasco in the states? He should of paid the yanks back out of his own pocket, the gobby little jerk. AND, all of my tax's that went into building the roads into and around Silverstone just so that he can go and totaly fek up one of the best purpose built bike tracks in the world. He should be made to pay the govenrment back the millions for those roads (and my ticket to the next motogp at Donnington).
There are only three people in this world i dont like, and he's all of them. I hope his tall leggy blonde Mrs runs off with 18 stone lesbian and tells The Sun that her new lover has a bigger willy than him. Now wouldnt that make my day.

Good luck to Hamilton, i hope he wins the title but i wont be watching.

Slider.

(did i get post #46, lol)

[Jabbs]

If he wasnt sat on that wall, he wouldnt reach.
I hate the little betty swollock. Cant one of the counter strike snipers nip over and slot him? Actually, don't worry, it won't be long before he dissapears up his own a*se anyway.
Remember the Michelin fiasco in the states? He should of paid the yanks back out of his own pocket, the gobby little jerk. AND, all of my tax's that went into building the roads into and around Silverstone just so that he can go and totaly fek up one of the best purpose built bike tracks in the world. He should be made to pay the govenrment back the millions for those roads (and my ticket to the next motogp at Donnington).
There are only three people in this world i dont like, and he's all of them. I hope his tall leggy blonde Mrs runs off with 18 stone lesbian and tells The Sun that her new lover has a bigger willy than him. Now wouldnt that make my day.

Good luck to Hamilton, i hope he wins the title but i wont be watching.

Slider.

(did i get post #46, lol)

ROFLMAO, nicely written post Slider :norty: :devil: :narnar: :yahoo: :roflmao:

[Doorman]

Ferrari's take on it That smells of PR. Knowing the appeal wont work they can afford to look magnanimous :eyebrow:

[OldBloke]

Ferrari's take on it That smells of PR. Knowing the appeal wont work they can afford to look magnanimous :eyebrow:

From the above link ...

It may be a month before McLaren's appeal is heard by the FIA, motor sport's governing body, meaning that two of the final five rounds of the title chase in Italy and Singapore could take place before Hamilton and Massa know the real state of their battle.

A MONTH! What more do they need other then the vids and telemetry already to hand?

[Jabbs]

Perhaps vital backing from Ferrari but at the end of the day, FIA will drag their heels until everyone gets totally fed up of it.  Most likely it will end as it stands now :sad:

[Armitage]

Worth a read
 
 
http://www.planet-f1.com/story/0,18954,3261_4120354,00.html

[OldBloke]

Worth a read
 
 
http://www.planet-f1.com/story/0,18954,3261_4120354,00.html

Indeed. Excellent stuff.

[Blunt]

Worth a read
 
 
http://www.planet-f1.com/story/0,18954,3261_4120354,00.html

good link in the responses (no sound)

[Snokio]

Jarno Trulli reckons Hamilton gained an advantage:

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/70435

[Blunt]

Jarno Trulli reckons Hamilton gained an advantage:

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/70435

"Had there been a wall there, instead of the surfaced escape route, would Lewis have attacked anyway? Had there been gravel, he wouldn't have had the chance to attack when rejoining the track because of dirty tyres."

Jarno UnTrulli thinks otherwise
"Had there been a semi-permeable membrane, instead of the surfaced escape route, would Lewis have attacked anyway? Had there been a chance of certain death, he wouldn't have had the chance to attack when rejoining the track because of dirty thoughts."

[TeaLeaf]

Unfortunately Trulli states the draft effect as the advantage, which has already been stated by several people to have been a non-factor due to the fact that they did not slip-stream each other.  The discussion about 'would he have tried to overtake if there had been fish/wall/membrane on the outside of the corner, whilst possibly interesting, unfortunately has zero bearing on the discussion as FIA rules currently allow it.

[Jabbs]

Unfortunately Trulli states the draft effect as the advantage, which has already been stated by several people to have been a non-factor due to the fact that they did not slip-stream each other.  The discussion about 'would he have tried to overtake if there had been fish/wall/membrane on the outside of the corner, whilst possibly interesting, unfortunately has zero bearing on the discussion as FIA rules currently allow it.

True, but as I've mentioned and I'm sure we all know by now is that Lewis would have been in a position to slipstream Kim regardless of whether he cut the corner or not due to the fact that he was right on his tail in the first place!

Jarno untruly, while being an experience driver seems to have missed this vital point!

Had he stayed on the road, he wouldn't have had the speed to overtake the Ferrari.

Which is of course total **** (insert your favourite explitive here )  

Lewis was WAY faster at that point in the race.  He also seems to have forgotten that Lewis had slowed (6kph slower) to give back the 'advantage' that Kimi had.

[Armitage]

appeal going a head
 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/motorsport/formula_one/7603179.stm

[OldBloke]

appeal going a head
 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/motorsport/formula_one/7603179.stm

Not quite ...

There is some debate about whether the rules allow for teams to appeal against a time penalty - but that will be decided by the FIA court of appeal.

[TeaLeaf]

Again, yet another aspect of the bizarre rules application of the stewards.  Several penalties available to them, including a grid penalty for the following grand prix, so why pick the most severe option of the three for something that is allegedly so debatable?  I have yet to find anyone who thought that was a 'severe' example of anything.

TL.